Care Connexions UK Limited
Home care, Croydon
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Care Connexions UK Limited: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Rated Good in July 2025.
The latest rating was published 16 months ago.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2025 (assessment visit 16 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 5 March to 24 March 2025. The service is a supported living service providing care and support to people with mental health needs. The service also supported people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our inspection, the service supported 7 people living in 3 houses. This was the first inspection of this service.
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Read the full summary
People told us the support they received was good. The provider had made efforts to ensure staff responded to people’s needs and preferences and provided support when, and in the way they wanted. The provider had carried out quality assurance monitoring. However, this was not always systematically recorded. The registered manager told us they would address this, and we noted actions had commenced during the period of our assessment.
People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks to people. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications, and experience. Staff received the training and support they required to deliver high-quality care.
People were involved in assessments of their care and support. Their care plans were regularly reviewed to take account of changes in needs and preferences. Staff worked in partnership with other professionals involved in people’s care to ensure positive outcomes. Staff ensured people understood their care plans to enable them to give informed consent. Where people were unable to give consent, the provider had applied for Deprivation of liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisations. DoLS is required under the Mental Capacity Act (2005) to ensure people are not unduly restricted where they are unable to consent to any restrictions, for example, in going into the community unaccompanied.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected privacy and dignity and respected people’s choices. They supported people to maintain valued relationships and participate in community activities. Staff provided flexible support to people in accordance with their wishes. The provider supported staff wellbeing.
The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through staff training, information, and feedback.
Managers and staff had a shared vision and culture which focused on putting people first. Staff and people told us managers were knowledgeable, available and supportive. We observed they knew people and staff well, and we noted from the records we saw they were actively involved in people’s care and support.
Managers and staff had a shared vision and culture focused on putting people first. Staff felt they were treated equally. They understood their roles and responsibilities and told us they were able to request support or raise concerns at any time. Managers worked with local community organisations to identify support and activities to enhance people’s lives. There was a culture of learning and development to ensure continuous improvement.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 10 Brent Road, South Croydon, CR2 7NR |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Selsdon, Croydon |
| Phone | 07960 595854 |
| Registered manager | Edith Hughes |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Care Connexions UK Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 11073958 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G Immaculate Healthcare Services Limited Croydon Home care, 0.3 miles awayGood
- G Comfort Living Care Office Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- G Crown46 Client Care Home care, 0.6 miles awayGood
- RI Bluebird Care (Croydon) Home care, 1.3 miles awayRequires improvement
- – Center Homecare Home care, 1.3 miles awayNot yet rated
Getting help from London Borough of Croydon
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Croydon
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0208 726 6500
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Care Connexions UK Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Care Connexions UK Limited.
- When was Care Connexions UK Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Care Connexions UK Limited was published on 1 July 2025.
- Who runs Care Connexions UK Limited?
- Care Connexions UK Limited is run by Care Connexions UK Limited.
- What is Care Connexions UK Limited's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.