Rated Care Homes

Be Caring Manchester

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2017, most recently Good in April 2025.

  • 18 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 43 of 50

    rated home care services in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.

Be Caring Manchester: inspection record

Home care, Manchester

Rated Good in April 2025.

Be Caring Manchester: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cornellius Healthcare Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Affordable Care At Home Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Rainbow Living Care Limited No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Age Concern Home Care - South Manchester Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Village 135 Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Manchester

See all home care services in Wythenshawe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 April 2025 (assessment visit 16 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Be Caring Manchester is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. The service was supporting 113 people at the time of the inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Date of assessment: 29 Jan to 20 March 2025.

The assessment was triggered by intelligence we received about poor care. This was sent in anonymously and was not substantiated during the onsite visit.

This service has been rated good. People and families we spoke with raised some concerns about staff training and receiving visits from unfamiliar staff at weekends. The provider responded proactively to resolve the concerns raised during the course of the assessment. Our review of induction and training processes did not find any concerns.

People were safe and supported by staff who understood how to protect them from abuse and avoidable harm. Care plans had improved since the last inspection and now contained the right level of detail. Staffing levels were safe. Staff were recruited safely. The service had safe systems in place for the appropriate and safe handling of medicines.

People and their families were consulted about the care provided and were supported to achieve outcomes to improve their health and wellbeing. The service worked well with other health and social care professionals and supported people to achieve good outcomes. There was good support in place for staff. We spoke to 19 staff. They told us they were valued and received the support they required.

Staff supported people to understand their rights. Staff had received relevant training. There were a low level of complaints and people were able to contact the service to raise concerns if required.

The provider had a very clear vision, strategy and culture. The management team were professional and passionate about providing high quality care and this was supported by the systems they had in place. Clear plans were in place to further develop the service with the aim of achieving an outstanding rating.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Henry Tonks
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 23 May 2023. Latest assessment published 8 April 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05367714 (opens Companies House)

Be Caring Ltd runs 7 services in England, 2 of them in the North West. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Be Caring Ltd

  1. O
    Be Caring Leeds Outstanding. Home care, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. G
    Be Caring Liverpool Good. Home care, Liverpool
  3. G
    Be Caring Newcastle Good. Home care, Newcastle upon Tyne, North East
  4. –
    Be Caring Bradford Not yet rated. Home care, Bradford, Yorkshire and the Humber

See all 7 services run by Be Caring Ltd

Getting help from Manchester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Be Caring Manchester provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Be Caring Manchester.
When was Be Caring Manchester last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Be Caring Manchester was published on 8 April 2025.
Who runs Be Caring Manchester?
Be Caring Manchester is run by Be Caring Ltd. It runs 7 services in England, 2 of them in the North West.
What is Be Caring Manchester's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 April 2025.

Contact

Address
294 Portway, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M22 1TG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cornellius Healthcare Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Affordable Care At Home Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Rainbow Living Care Limited No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Age Concern Home Care - South Manchester Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Village 135 Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Manchester

See all home care services in Wythenshawe