Rated Care Homes

Manchester Primecare

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 43 of 50

    rated home care services in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.

Manchester Primecare: inspection record

Home care, Manchester

Rated Good in February 2023, up from Requires improvement.

Manchester Primecare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Home Instead South Manchester Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Sheila-Jeans Home Care Limited Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    We Care Chorlton Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. –
    South Manchester Care Limited No overall rating, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Caring Hands Solutions Ltd Good, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Manchester

See all home care services in Chorlton-cum-Hardy

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 17 February 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Manchester Primecare is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to 5 people at the time of the inspection. The service provides support to older people and younger adults.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People were supported safely. Risks were identified and mitigated. Staff understood strategies to reduce risks to people. Medicines were safely managed. People were assessed to ensure the correct medicines support was implemented. Safeguarding arrangements were robust, and staff were confident to raise any concerns. Incidents were recorded and analysed to reduce further occurrences. Infection control was well managed.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Assessments were completed to ensure the provider could meet people's needs. Where support was required with eating and drinking or health interventions, this was clearly captured in the person's care plan. Staff received a full induction linked to The Care Certificate when commencing employment with the provider. The Care Certificate is an agreed set of standards that define the knowledge, skills and behaviours expected of specific job roles in the health and social care sectors. It is made up of the 15 minimum standards that should form part of a robust induction programme. Inhouse and online training was completed annually by staff. Regular spot checks and supervision were completed by the registered manager on staff.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were caring and had built positive relationships with the people they supported. People felt they were provided with dignified care and spoke positively about the staff and the registered manager.

Care plans were detailed and gave clear guidance for staff to support people effectively. Care plans were regularly reviewed to ensure they were factual and up to date. The provider had a robust complaints management process in place. No complaints had been received since the last inspection. The provider was not actively supporting anyone who was at the end of their life, however, there were policies and procedures in place to support end of life care and staff had received training to enhance their knowledge.

The provider had embedded many improvements across the service since the last inspection. Audits to monitor the service were completed monthly and any to do actions were captured and added to the

provider's improvement plan. Staff felt well support by the registered manager and enjoyed working for the provider. The provider had been working with the local authority to improve outcomes for the people they support.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kimberley Edmundson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 17 February 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10031182 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Manchester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Manchester Primecare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Manchester Primecare.
When was Manchester Primecare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Manchester Primecare was published on 17 February 2023.
Who runs Manchester Primecare?
Manchester Primecare is run by Manchester Prime Care Limited.
What is Manchester Primecare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 February 2023.