Rated Care Homes

Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2021.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 35 of 212

    rated home care services in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House: inspection record

Home care, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in October 2023.

Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Aspire Home Carers (Ramsgate) Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Your Life Your Home (Good, 2.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Aspire Home Carers (Ramsgate) Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Your Life Your Home Good, 2.6 miles away
  3. G
    Home Instead Good, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Caremark (Dover) Good, 4 miles away
  5. –
    Positive Solutions Kent CIC Not yet rated, 4.3 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 21 October 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes, who were at the end of their lives or may be living with dementia or other health conditions. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service was providing personal care to 36 people.

What inspectors found

Risks to people's health and safety where identified. However, guidance on what action to take if the risk occurred was not consistently recorded. There was a failure to fully assess and mitigate risks to some people. Care records lacked guidance to ensure people received consistent and safe support. There was not an adequate process for continually assessing and monitoring the quality of the service. Staff were not always recruited safely.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

When people were living with dementia, decision specific capacity assessments had not been recorded. However, people were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests Staff understood how to support people to make decisions and did this on a day to day basis.

People received a reliable service from staff who knew how to provide their care in a safe way. Staff understood their responsibilities in protecting people from abuse and knew how to report any concerns they had. People were happy with the care they received and felt safe with the staff that were supporting them. People told us they were treated kindly and compassionately by the staff.

Staff communicated effectively with people and with each other to make sure people's needs were met in the way they had chosen. When people were unwell or needed extra support, they were referred to health care professionals and other external agencies. People received person-centred care that promoted their dignity and independence. Staff followed infection control policies and practices to help protect people from any infection.

People and their relatives told us the service was well managed and gave positive feedback about the service they received. They said the registered manager was approachable and sorted out any issues they had. People and their relatives spoke highly of the registered manager and staff.

Staff knew their roles and were able to tell us about the values and the vision of the service. The registered manager visited people and made calls to check people were happy with the service. Any complaints that were made were managed in the right way and people had been invited to suggest improvements to the service.

There were sufficient numbers of staff to provide the care people needed. People and their relatives said that staff arrived when they should and stayed the allotted amount of time. They reported that they had not had any missed calls. Staff received the training they needed to look after people in the way that suited them best. Staff received support, guidance and advice from the registered manager. The registered manager checked that staff were working with people safely.

People's needs were assessed and reviewed to ensure care being delivered was up to date and reflective of their needs. People had care plans that provided detailed guidance for staff on the support and care that they needed on a daily basis. People were supported to do things they wanted to do. People consented to their care and were supported by staff who were trained to fulfil their roles effectively. Staff were aware of the importance of good nutrition to people's health and well-being. Medicines were managed safety and people received their medicines as prescribed by their doctor.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 October 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 October 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Soneni Nkomo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 21 October 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11611558 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House.
When was Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House was published on 21 October 2023.
Who runs Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House?
Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House is run by Livingstone Care Solutions Limited.
What is Livingstone Care Office - Innovation House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 October 2023.

Contact

Phone
07769 853836
Address
Office 31, Floor 1, Innovation House, Discovery Park, Sandwich, CT13 9FF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Aspire Home Carers (Ramsgate) Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Your Life Your Home (Good, 2.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Aspire Home Carers (Ramsgate) Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Your Life Your Home Good, 2.6 miles away
  3. G
    Home Instead Good, 3.3 miles away
  4. G
    Caremark (Dover) Good, 4 miles away
  5. –
    Positive Solutions Kent CIC Not yet rated, 4.3 miles away

See all home care services in Kent