Rated Care Homes

DayByDay Care Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

DayByDay Care Limited: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025, down from Good.

DayByDay Care Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Nuliving Homecare (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Greyfriars Lodge Extra Care Housing (Good, 2.7 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Nuliving Homecare Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Majesty Healthcare Ltd Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Castle Care Teesdale Limited Good, 5.9 miles away
  5. G
    Kirkwood Hall Good, 7.1 miles away

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 June 2025 (assessment visit 22 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 10 March to 2 April 2025. The assessment was triggered by concerns received about the quality of the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This is a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the registered manager informed us that the service was not supporting anyone whose primary need and reason for support was related to their learning disability or autism. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

We found 3 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, safe care and treatment and governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

The provider did not consistently protect people from abuse and improper treatment. We identified a safeguarding concern during the assessment. Staff did not always have appropriate guidance to enable them to provide care to meet people’s needs that was safe, supportive and in line with best practice. The governance of the service had failed to create a positive culture and staff morale was low. Staff did not feel involved, valued or listened to by management. Issues, concerns and complaints were not always robustly investigated to support effective learning.

There was not always a strong proactive and positive culture of safety within the service. The provider did not always report safety events. Whilst care calls were covered, staff were required to travel long distances and work long hours. There was a high staff turnover. Staff supervisions were not always meaningful and there were some shortfalls in staff training.

There were multiple medicine errors identified in audits. The provider had implemented new processes in an attempt to reduce these errors. The provider took some steps to support continuity of care across services. Some areas of people’s care plans contained a good level of information, and some professionals spoke positively about staff knowledge of people’s needs. The provider had introduced focus groups to try and involve staff more and improve morale. The registered manager was a member of a local external care group who met weekly to share knowledge, experiences and promote good practice. The provider had measures in place to gather feedback. Professionals told us communication with the service was good.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and safeguarding people from abuse.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 7 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ringisayi Muzamhindo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 23 June 2023. Latest assessment published 7 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12453379 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does DayByDay Care Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for DayByDay Care Limited.
When was DayByDay Care Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for DayByDay Care Limited was published on 7 June 2025.
Who runs DayByDay Care Limited?
DayByDay Care Limited is run by DayByDay Care Ltd.
What is DayByDay Care Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 7 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
07598 683291
Address
Unit10, Chartermark Way, IPS Innovate, Catterick Garrison, DL9 4QJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Nuliving Homecare (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Greyfriars Lodge Extra Care Housing (Good, 2.7 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Nuliving Homecare Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Majesty Healthcare Ltd Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Castle Care Teesdale Limited Good, 5.9 miles away
  5. G
    Kirkwood Hall Good, 7.1 miles away

See all home care services in North Yorkshire