Bentley Court Care Home
- Care home
- 77 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2021
- Wednesfield, Wolverhampton, West Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
12 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
17 months
since the latest rating was published.
20 of 63
rated care homes in Wolverhampton are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Bentley Court Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in May 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Newcross Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Waterside House (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Duke Street Bungalows Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- RI Victoria Court Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Newcross Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Waterside House Good, 0.6 miles away
- RI Primrose Hill Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 May 2025 (assessment visit 11 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 6 March 2025 to 17 March 2025. This assessment was carried out in response to CQC receiving information of concern. The service is a nursing home providing accommodation and nursing and personal care to older people, younger adults, those living with physical disabilities, and those living with dementia. There were insufficient staff to support people effectively. People were not consistently given choices about their care and support and care plans and risk assessments were not always followed. Medicines were not consistently stored safely, and governance systems were not always effective in identifying concerns and making improvements. There were missed opportunities for learning and the providers culture was not always followed by all staff. However, people were safeguarded from abuse and were supported by suitably recruited staff. Medicines were administered safely. Assessments using evidence-based tools were in place and staff sought peoples consent to provide care. People’s health needs were met, and they had their protected characteristics considered. People were given information in their preferred format and plans for the future were considered. The provider ensured staff were treated equitably and worked in partnership with other agencies to deliver people’s care. The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to staffing and governance systems. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring No rating
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to staffing levels in the service.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 22 May 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 22 May 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 22 May 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 4 October 2022. Latest assessment published 22 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Bondcare (Regions) LimitedBrand: Bondcare
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13298305 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from City of Wolverhampton Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at City of Wolverhampton Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01902 551199, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: City of Wolverhampton Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Bentley Court Care Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Bentley Court Care Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Bentley Court Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 77 beds at Bentley Court Care Home.
- When was Bentley Court Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bentley Court Care Home was published on 22 May 2025.
- Who runs Bentley Court Care Home?
- Bentley Court Care Home is run by Bondcare (Regions) Limited.
- What is Bentley Court Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 22 May 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01902 722100
- Address
- 29 Nordley Road, Wolverhampton, WV11 1PX Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Newcross Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Waterside House (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Duke Street Bungalows Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- RI Victoria Court Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Newcross Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Waterside House Good, 0.6 miles away
- RI Primrose Hill Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away