Rated Care Homes

Adelphi Residential Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 61 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Adelphi Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, Lancashire

Rated Requires improvement in March 2026, down from Good.

Adelphi Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grange (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Highgrove House (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Westwood Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Grange Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Highgrove House Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Gillibrand Hall Nursing Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Coniston House Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Chorley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 March 2026 (assessment visit 29 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment date: 12 and 13 February 2026. Adelphi Residential Care Home is a care home (without nursing) which supports older people.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The facilities and equipment did not meet people’s needs. Risks were not always managed or mitigated. Recruitment of staff was not always managed using safe processes. Medicines were not always managed well. People were protected and kept safe from the risk of abuse, however governance processes around monitoring Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards needed to be strengthened. However, the provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents.

Assessments of people’s needs were in place, but it was not clear how often they were reviewed. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving between services. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. People were involved in planning their future care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders did have clear responsibilities and systems of accountability. Audits were not always effective and there was not always a focus on improving the facilities and premises. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas.

We found 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 23 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 23 March 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Alison Redshaw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 5 March 2021. Latest assessment published 23 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Mr B Brown
Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Adelphi Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Adelphi Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Adelphi Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Adelphi Residential Care Home.
When was Adelphi Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Adelphi Residential Care Home was published on 23 March 2026.
Who runs Adelphi Residential Care Home?
Adelphi Residential Care Home is run by Mr B Brown.
What is Adelphi Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 23 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01257 271361
Address
35 Queens Road, Chorley, PR7 1LA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grange (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Highgrove House (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Westwood Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Grange Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Highgrove House Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Gillibrand Hall Nursing Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Coniston House Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Chorley