Rated Care Homes

Agnes House 81

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in January 2020.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 21 of 79

    rated care homes in Sandwell are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Agnes House 81: inspection record

Care home, 2 beds, Sandwell

Rated Requires improvement in January 2020.

Agnes House 81: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Newbury Manor Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Agnes House Flat 1 (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Agnes House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Newbury Manor Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Portway House Care Home Limited Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Agnes House Flat 1 Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    The Gables Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Sandwell

See all care homes in Oldbury

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 10 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Agnes House 81 is residential care home providing personal care for up to two people with a Learning disability. The service was supporting one person at the time of the inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

Systems to monitor the way medicines were administered required improvement to ensure issues could be identified and addressed in a timely manner. People did receive their medicines when they needed them.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The environment was homely in design and met people's needs, but renewal work and repairs were not completed in a timely manner. Quality assurance systems were not robust enough to identify shortfalls and drive improvement. Records to support the oversight of the service were not readily available during the inspection visit for us to review.

People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff who knew them well and had an awareness of how to escalate any concerns about people's safety. Staff had received the training they required for their role but were awaiting refresher training to update their skills and knowledge.

Staff wore gloves and aprons to ensure they protected people from cross infection. Some systems were in place to enable the staff and the registered manager to learn lessons from any incident and accidents that had occurred in the service.

Staff sought peoples consent before providing support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People accessed healthcare services to ensure they received ongoing healthcare support. People were given choices and were involved to make daily decisions around their care.

People had meaningful activities to occupy them on a daily basis. People had care plans in place which provided staff with information about their needs and preferences and how they would like these to be met. However, support plans were not updated in a timely manner when people's needs changed. A complaints procedure was in place and people and their relatives knew how to raise concerns.

Rating at last inspection and update. The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 5 December 2018).

The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection enough improvement had not been sustained and the provider was still in breach of regulations. The service remains rated requires improvement. This service has been rated requires improvement for the last two consecutive inspections.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 10 January 2020. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 10 January 2020. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 January 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Riccardo Chieza
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 10 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Charnat Care LimitedBrand: Alphonsus Care Services
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05462789 (opens Companies House)

Charnat Care Limited runs 4 services, all in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Charnat Care Limited

  1. G
    Agnes House Flat 1 Good. Care home, Sandwell
  2. RI
    Agnes House Requires improvement. Care home, Sandwell
  3. RI
    Charnat Support Services Requires improvement. Home care, Sandwell

Getting help from Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Agnes House 81 provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Agnes House 81 as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Agnes House 81 have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 2 beds at Agnes House 81.
When was Agnes House 81 last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Agnes House 81 was published on 10 January 2020.
Who runs Agnes House 81?
Agnes House 81 is run by Charnat Care Limited. It runs 4 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Agnes House 81's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 10 January 2020.

Contact

Address
81 Newbury Lane, Oldbury, B69 1HE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Newbury Manor Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Agnes House Flat 1 (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Agnes House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Newbury Manor Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Portway House Care Home Limited Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Agnes House Flat 1 Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    The Gables Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Sandwell

See all care homes in Oldbury