Chesford Grange Care Home
- Care home
- 74 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Berry Hill, Stoke-on-Trent, West Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
58 of 76
rated care homes in Stoke-on-Trent are rated Good, like this one.
Chesford Grange Care Home: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Park Hall Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Choices Housing Association Limited - 2 Cowley Way Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Adderley Green Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- G The Meadows Good, 0.8 miles away
- I Ash Hall Nursing Home Inadequate, 1.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 July 2026 (assessment visit 22 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out an unannounced inspection of this service on 27 May 2026 and 1 June 2026. Chesford Grange Care Home is a care home providing nursing and personal care for up to 74 people at the time of the inspection, 73 people were using the service. The service supports older people and younger adults living with dementia, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments.
- Safe Good
- Caring Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out this inspection in response to previous enforcement action taken following the last inspection.
The provider had made significant improvements since the last inspection, particularly in relation to governance systems and the management of medicines. Safeguarding practices had also strengthened, with improvements in incident monitoring, oversight, and the timely submission of safeguarding referrals. Further progress had been made in escalating concerns to healthcare professionals and ensuring care plans were accurate, up to date, and reflected people's current needs.
Staff demonstrated an understanding of how to identify, raise and respond to safeguarding concerns. There were sufficient skilled staff to support people safely, medicines were managed appropriately and infection prevention and control practices had improved. The provider promoted learning from incidents and used this to improve practice. Although an environmental concern relating to overheating in communal areas was identified during the inspection, immediate action was taken to address it. Overall, systems and processes supported people to receive safe care while maintaining their independence, choice and wellbeing.
Staff knew people well and provided personalised support that reflected their needs, preferences and choices. People and relatives spoke positively about the care provided. People were involved in decisions about their care and encouraged to maintain their independence. Staff responded appropriately to people's wellbeing needs and were supported by the management team to deliver person-centred care.
Leadership, governance and oversight arrangements had strengthened since the last inspection. Staff felt able to raise concerns, share ideas and contribute to service development, creating an open and inclusive culture. Effective quality assurance systems were used to monitor performance, identify risks and drive improvement. The provider worked proactively with external professionals and used feedback, audits and learning to improve outcomes for people. Staff told us they felt valued and involved in the ongoing development of the service.
-
Safe
Good
Safe
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and safeguarding people from abuse. Enough Improvements was found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of theses legal regulation.
-
Caring
Good
Caring
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. Enough Improvements was found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this legal regulation.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Oana Mccaffrey
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 5 January 2023. Latest assessment published 10 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Chesford Grange Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 12000815 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Stoke-on-Trent City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Stoke-on-Trent City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0800 561 0015, Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Chesford Grange Care Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Chesford Grange Care Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Chesford Grange Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 74 beds at Chesford Grange Care Home.
- When was Chesford Grange Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Chesford Grange Care Home was published on 10 July 2026.
- Who runs Chesford Grange Care Home?
- Chesford Grange Care Home is run by Chesford Grange Care Limited.
- What is Chesford Grange Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01782 498103
- Address
- 358 Ubberley Road, Bentilee, Stoke-on-trent, ST2 0QS Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Park Hall Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Choices Housing Association Limited - 2 Cowley Way Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Adderley Green Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- G The Meadows Good, 0.8 miles away
- I Ash Hall Nursing Home Inadequate, 1.1 miles away