Rated Care Homes

Darwin House Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 87 of 107

    rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Darwin House Limited: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, Sheffield

Rated Good in June 2026.

Darwin House Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Cairn Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Bridgedale House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Storth Oaks Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    The Laurels and The Limes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. O
    Moorville House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Ecclesall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 June 2026 (assessment visit 11 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment date 18 May to 2 June 2026. Darwin house is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 22 older people. At the time of our inspection, 20 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

There was a warm and welcoming atmosphere at Darwin House, where people appeared well cared for and comfortable. A strong, positive culture was evident throughout the service, centred on delivering personalised, person-focused care. Staff consistently treated people with kindness, dignity, and respect, demonstrating a thorough understanding of each individual living at Darwin House.

People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. The home was clean, and people were protected from the risk and spread of infections. There were enough staff available to assist people to meet their needs in a timely way.

People's needs were assessed, and care delivered in line with best practice. Care plans and supporting documentation included people's individual choices and preferences. Risks in relation to people's care were identified and detailed information about how risks could be mitigated.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to identify any trends or patterns. This helped to mitigate future risks and ensured lessons were learned.

The provider had a safe recruitment process which assisted them in recruiting suitable staff.

A training plan evidenced staff had received appropriate training to carry out their roles effectively. Competency assessments were also in place for things such as medicine administration.

People were supported to maintain a healthy and balanced diet which included their preferences. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Throughout the inspection we observed staff interacting with people in a caring and considerate way. We saw staff gaining people's consent prior to carrying out care tasks. People we spoke with were complimentary about the care and support they received.

The management team carried out regular audits to ensure the quality of the service was maintained. The management team took appropriate actions to address any issues. People and their relatives had confidence in the management team and felt they were approachable.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Cheryl Payne
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 5 March 2020. Latest assessment published 15 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02274406 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Darwin House Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Darwin House Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Darwin House Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Darwin House Limited.
When was Darwin House Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Darwin House Limited was published on 15 June 2026.
Who runs Darwin House Limited?
Darwin House Limited is run by Darwin House Limited.
What is Darwin House Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 June 2026.

Contact

Address
Darwin Lane, Sheffield, S10 5RG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Cairn Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Bridgedale House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Storth Oaks Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    The Laurels and The Limes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. O
    Moorville House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Ecclesall