Rated Care Homes

Moorville House

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 4 of 107

    rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Moorville House: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Sheffield

Rated Outstanding in October 2025, up from Good.

Moorville House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Glades at Moorville Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Porterbrook Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Laurels and The Limes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Alexander Court Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Cairn Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Stannington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2025 (assessment visit 21 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 August to 22 September 2025. Moorville House is a residential care home, providing support to younger adults, some of whom may be living with a learning disability and/or autism. The service can support up to 8 people, and at the time of our assessment 6 people were living at the service. We assessed and inspected the service due to the length of time since the last assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found people received care and support in accordance with the principles of this guidance.

Right support

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Restrictions were reviewed and creative solutions sought to reduce their use.

Staff maintained exceptional focus on people's strengths and promoted what they could do, this meant people had a fulfilling and meaningful everyday life and opportunities for new experiences. People were supported by staff to achieve their aspirations and pursue their interests.

Staff supported people with their medicines in a way that promoted their independence and achieved the best possible health outcomes. People played an active role in maintaining their own health and wellbeing. All restraint and restrictions were recorded and reviewed. Staff learned from these incidents and actions were taken to reduce the chances of people becoming distressed.

Right Care

Staff wanted to support people to have fulfilling lives and to see people achieve their goals and dreams for the future. The provider made sure people got all the information they needed in an accessible way for them, to make decisions about their care and support while feeling comfortable and safe.

Staff demonstrated effective skills in communication and behavioural support strategies. Staffing levels were adjusted to suit the needs and choices of people. People's needs were assessed holistically and modelled on best practice, considering individualised approaches to deliver the best outcomes for people.

People's equality and diverse needs were consistently promoted. Staff understood people's individual needs and a multi-cultural workforce provided culturally appropriate care. Staff protected people from poor care and abuse and worked well with other agencies to do so.

People's individual needs were met by the adaptation, design and decoration of the home. The service gave people care and support in a safe, clean, well equipped, well-furnished and well-maintained environment that met their sensory and physical needs.

Right culture

People led fully inclusive and empowered lives because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the provider, management and staff team. It was very clear staff were enormously proud of the work they did in supporting people. People received exceptionally good quality care and support because trained staff and specialists who genuinely cared about people, could meet their needs and wishes

People were supported by staff who fully understood best practice in relation to the wide range of strengths, impairments or sensitivities people with a learning disability and/or autistic people may have. This meant people received exceptionally compassionate and empowering care that was tailored to their individual needs.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
June Struggles
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 31 January 2018. Latest assessment published 15 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06673606 (opens Companies House)

Moorville Developments Limited runs 11 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Moorville Developments Limited

  1. O
    Collegiate House Outstanding. Care home, Sheffield
  2. O
    Hallamgate House Outstanding. Care home, Sheffield
  3. G
    Meadow View Good. Care home, Sheffield
  4. G
    Oak Farm Good. Care home, Sheffield

See all 11 services run by Moorville Developments Limited

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Moorville House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Moorville House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Moorville House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Moorville House.
When was Moorville House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Moorville House was published on 15 October 2025.
Who runs Moorville House?
Moorville House is run by Moorville Developments Limited. It runs 11 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Moorville House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 15 October 2025.

Contact

Address
24 Ryegate Road, Sheffield, S10 5FA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Glades at Moorville Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Porterbrook Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Laurels and The Limes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Alexander Court Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Cairn Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Stannington