Collegiate House
- Care home
- 8 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2023
- Central Sheffield, Sheffield, Yorkshire and the Humber
Outstanding
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
4 of 107
rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Outstanding, like this one.
Collegiate House: inspection record
Rated Outstanding in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Aaron House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Hallamshire Residential Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Broomgrove Trust Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Eagle House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Grange Crescent Good, 0.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 August 2026 (assessment visit 18 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out this assessment on 12 and 13 August 2026. We carried out this assessment to give the provider their first rating. The service is a residential care home, which can accommodate up to 8 people. There were 4 people using the service at the time of our assessment.
- Safe Outstanding
- Effective Outstanding
- Caring Outstanding
- Responsive Outstanding
- Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary
An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was meeting the principles of Right support, right care, right culture’.
The service demonstrated an outstanding person-centred approach, with a strong culture of learning, continuous improvement, and partnership working. Staff used detailed analysis of incidents and behaviours to develop tailored support strategies, resulting in significant improvements in people's well-being, independence, social inclusion, and quality of life.
People were safeguarded by a positive and open culture where they felt safe and well supported. Risk management was highly personalised, promoting independence while reducing harm through innovative approaches, proactive interventions, and close collaboration with families and professionals.
The service provided safe transitions, maintained detailed and effective care records, and was highly regarded by external professionals. People benefited from a stable, skilled staff team, comprehensive training, and strong leadership that promoted high-quality care and staff development.
The environment was safe, well maintained, and adapted to meet individual needs, while infection prevention measures were robust. Medicines were managed exceptionally well, with regular reviews helping to reduce unnecessary medication and improve people's well-being and independence.
The service provided highly personalised, effective care that was regularly reviewed and adapted to meet people's changing needs, preferences and goals. People and families were actively involved in care planning, and detailed records supported staff to deliver consistent, person-centred support that promoted choice, independence and wellbeing.
Care was delivered in line with evidence-based practice, with strong involvement from healthcare professionals and specialist services. Staff worked proactively to address health needs, followed professional guidance, and received specialist training to ensure people achieved positive outcomes while reducing restrictive practices.
There was a strong culture of teamwork and partnership working. Staff, families and professionals collaborated effectively to ensure coordinated, holistic care, helping people access specialist support and achieve meaningful improvements in communication, health and emotional well-being.
People were supported to live healthier lives through personalised health promotion, increased access to healthcare, healthy lifestyle initiatives, physical activities and ongoing support with areas such as weight management and oral health. This resulted in measurable improvements in both physical and mental well-being.
The provider had effective systems to monitor progress and outcomes, with people making positive achievements in areas including independence, health, community participation and personal goals. People's rights, choices and consent were consistently respected, with staff using creative and accessible approaches to support decision-making and uphold independence, dignity and control over their lives.
Staff delivered highly personalised, responsive care that was tailored to people's individual needs, preferences, goals and aspirations. Staff knew people exceptionally well and supported them to live meaningful lives through a wide range of activities, education, employment opportunities and community involvement, while ensuring people remained in control of decisions about their daily lives.
Care was well coordinated and regularly reviewed with people, families and professionals to ensure support remained effective and responsive to changing needs. Strong communication systems, detailed care planning and accessible information enabled people to make informed choices, express their views and actively participate in decisions about their care.
The provider actively listened to feedback from people and used it to make meaningful improvements to both the service and individuals' quality of life. People were empowered through advocacy, involvement in recruitment, regular reviews and opportunities to influence how the service operated.
Staff worked proactively to remove barriers and promote equality, inclusion and access to healthcare, education, employment and community opportunities. People were supported to develop relationships, maintain community connections, explore their identities and achieve outcomes that were important to them.
The service was exceptionally well led, with strong, visible and supportive leadership that promoted a positive, person-centred culture. Staff felt valued, respected and well supported, with high morale, effective teamwork and a shared commitment to delivering outstanding outcomes for people.
Leaders were approachable, knowledgeable and highly regarded by people, relatives and staff. They maintained strong oversight of the service, promoted open communication and created an environment where everyone felt comfortable raising ideas, concerns and feedback. This openness contributed to a culture of continuous improvement and accountability.
The provider demonstrated a strong commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion, ensuring both people and staff were treated fairly and supported to achieve their full potential. Staff described an inclusive workplace where they felt respected, listened to and empowered.
Governance arrangements were highly effective, with comprehensive auditing, quality assurance and performance monitoring systems used to maintain high standards and drive service improvements. Leaders used feedback, reviews, incidents and outcomes data to identify learning opportunities and improve people's experiences and quality of life.
Partnership working was a key strength, with excellent relationships maintained with families, professionals and community organisations. These partnerships helped people access meaningful opportunities, build relationships, stay connected to their communities and achieve positive outcomes.
The service also demonstrated a strong culture of learning, innovation and continuous development. Quality improvement activities consistently focused on enhancing people's independence, wellbeing and quality of life, ensuring care remained responsive, person-centred and outcome focused.
-
Safe
Outstanding
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant people were protected by a strong and distinctive approach to safeguarding, including positive risk-taking to maximise their control over their lives. People were fully involved, and the provider was open and transparent when things went wrong.
-
Effective
Outstanding
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.
-
Caring
Outstanding
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.
-
Responsive
Outstanding
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.
-
Well-led
Outstanding
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Robert Sawyer
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Moorville Developments Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06673606 (opens Companies House)
Moorville Developments Limited runs 11 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Moorville Developments Limited
- O Hallamgate House Outstanding. Care home, Sheffield
- O Moorville House Outstanding. Care home, Sheffield
- G Meadow View Good. Care home, Sheffield
- G Oak Farm Good. Care home, Sheffield
Getting help from Sheffield City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Sheffield City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0114 273 4908
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Sheffield City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Collegiate House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Collegiate House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Collegiate House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Collegiate House.
- When was Collegiate House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Collegiate House was published on 27 August 2026.
- Who runs Collegiate House?
- Collegiate House is run by Moorville Developments Limited. It runs 11 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
- What is Collegiate House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 27 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07939 852966
- Address
- 16 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BA Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Aaron House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Hallamshire Residential Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Broomgrove Trust Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Eagle House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Grange Crescent Good, 0.6 miles away