Rated Care Homes

The Grange

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 40 of 56

    rated care homes in Stockport are rated Good, like this one.

The Grange: inspection record

Care home, 18 beds, Stockport

Rated Good in April 2026.

The Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Heaton Vale Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Cawood House Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. RI
    Hilltop Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. RI
    Bryn Haven Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Norwood Guest House Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Reddish

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 April 2026 (assessment visit 10 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 17 March to 23 March 2026.

The Grange is a residential care home providing care and support to older people. The home is registered to support up to 18 people, and at the time of the inspection 17 people were receiving care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People told us they felt safe living at the service. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs, and staff were responsive and available when needed. Staff were safely recruited and received the training and support required to carry out their roles. People received their medicines as prescribed, and medicines were stored appropriately. People’s needs and risks were assessed, and care plans were in place to guide staff. Regular checks and maintenance of the premises and equipment were completed, and the provider responded promptly to areas for improvement we identified.

People’s needs were assessed, and their health and wellbeing were monitored. Staff contacted external professionals when additional support was needed. Staff worked well together and with external services. People’s weight was generally stable, and they were provided with sufficient food and drink. People were supported to attend appointments, including dental care when required.

People were supported by a consistent staff team who knew them well. Feedback from people indicated staff were kind and caring. People were encouraged to make choices about their daily lives, and independence was promoted whenever possible. Staff told us they felt valued by the provider.

People received personalised care that reflected their needs and preferences, although this was not always fully recorded within care plans. Staff supported people in planning for their future, and the service had received positive feedback about the care provided to people approaching the end of their life. People felt able to share ideas or raise concerns, and there were various processes in place to gather feedback. People were supported to access the services they needed, and staff helped protect people’s rights.

People and relatives spoke highly of the registered manager and found them approachable and responsive. The registered manager had good oversight of the service, although some assurance processes were not consistently recorded in an auditable format. Staff were positive about working at the service, felt well supported, and said they could raise concerns if needed.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect, and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care, supported learning and innovation, and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Bobbie Walia
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 9 December 2020. Latest assessment published 19 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Grange provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Grange as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Grange have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 18 beds at The Grange.
When was The Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Grange was published on 19 April 2026.
Who runs The Grange?
The Grange is run by Z Yasin and Mrs B B Walia.
What is The Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 April 2026.

Contact

Address
154 Reddish Road, Stockport, SK5 7HZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Heaton Vale Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Cawood House Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. RI
    Hilltop Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. RI
    Bryn Haven Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Norwood Guest House Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Reddish