Rated Care Homes

Bryn Haven

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 15 of 56

    rated care homes in Stockport are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bryn Haven: inspection record

Care home, 42 beds, Stockport

Rated Requires improvement in July 2024, down from Good.

Bryn Haven: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brinnington Hall (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Appleton Lodge (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Brinnington Hall Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Appleton Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Appleton Manor Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Cawood House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    The Grange Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Bredbury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 July 2024 (assessment visit 14 March 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Bryn Haven is a residential care home providing personal care and dementia care to 40 people with a variety of conditions at the time of our site visits. The home is registered to provide care for up to 42 people over 2 floors in one building.

  • Safe No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This unannounced assessment was carried out between 24 April 2024 and 15 May 2024.

The assessment was triggered by concerns we received about the service. During the assessment we reviewed 11 quality statements across 3 key questions. Not all quality statements were reviewed at this assessment and consequently will not have a rating awarded at this time.

At this assessment we identified breaches of regulation, regarding medicines management, people’s individual risk management and safe staffing levels. We observed some people did not always appear well kempt or receive support in a timely way. We had concerns relating to the frequency of opportunity for people to have baths/showers. Staff had mostly been trained and had been recruited safely. Safety concerns and events were reported, investigated and any learning was shared with staff. The registered manager carried out many periodic checks, including daily walkarounds of the service and audits of care documentation. However, these checks had not always identified and/or actioned the concerns we found on this assessment.

The registered manager was responsive when we raised our concerns and had already put an action plan in place to address the issues found on day one of the site visits.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    We identified 3 breaches of regulations in relation to safe care and treatment under this key question of safe. Medicines were not always managed and administered safely. There was not always enough staff on duty to provide people with safe care and effective support. People’s individual risks were not always managed safely. Staff knew how look out for signs of abuse and report safeguarding concerns. Safety concerns and events were reported and investigated. Staff were recruited safely. People and visitors told us they felt safe.

  2. Caring

    No rating

    People and their relatives mostly told us staff were kind and caring and we observed some kind interactions between people and staff. However, we also made some observations of care which did not promote people’s dignity. We found concerns around people’s cleanliness and the timeliness of their support. People told us they made choices around their care and there were no visiting restrictions in place at the home.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Staff had access to whistleblowing procedures to raise any concerns. We received mixed feedback from staff around the availability and access to the registered manager as they were often very busy. The registered manager completed a suite of audits and oversight tools to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Periodic checks, including daily walkarounds of the service and audits of care documentation were completed by the registered manager. However, these checks had not always identified or actioned the concerns we found on this assessment, for example, thickener recordings, diet and fluid records, people’s cleanliness and concerns raised around staffing levels. The registered manager was quick to act in response to any concerns raised during this assessment. Notifications were submitted as required and people’s data was kept secure.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 17 July 2024. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 17 July 2024. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amanda Cumston
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 13 November 2020. Latest assessment published 17 July 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP27788R (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1007002

Borough Care Ltd runs 10 services, all in the North West. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Borough Care Ltd

  1. G
    Bamford Close Good. Care home, Stockport
  2. G
    Bruce Lodge Good. Care home, Stockport
  3. G
    Cawood House Good. Care home, Stockport
  4. G
    Lisburne Court Good. Care home, Stockport

See all 10 services run by Borough Care Ltd

Getting help from Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bryn Haven provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bryn Haven as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bryn Haven have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 42 beds at Bryn Haven.
When was Bryn Haven last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bryn Haven was published on 17 July 2024.
Who runs Bryn Haven?
Bryn Haven is run by Borough Care Ltd. It runs 10 services, all in the North West.
What is Bryn Haven's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 17 July 2024.

Contact

Address
Brinnington Road, Stockport, SK5 8BS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brinnington Hall (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Appleton Lodge (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Brinnington Hall Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Appleton Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Appleton Manor Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Cawood House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    The Grange Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Stockport

See all care homes in Bredbury