Hilltop Court Nursing Home
- Care home
- 50 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2012
- Central Stockport, Stockport, North West
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
10 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in August 2026.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
15 of 56
rated care homes in Stockport are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Hilltop Court Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bruce Lodge (Good, 0.9 miles away) and The Grange (Good, 0.9 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Heaton Vale Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Bruce Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- G The Grange Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Drakelow House Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Newlands Nursing & Residential Home Good, 1.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 August 2026 (assessment visit 8 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 23 June 2026 to 7 July 2026.
Hilltop Court Nursing Home is care home providing personal and nursing care to up to 50 people. The service supports older people, most of whom live with dementia. At the time of this inspection, there were 39 people living at the home. The inspection was to follow up on a warning notice issued at the last inspection.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At our last inspection, we found 4 breaches of regulation. At this assessment, we found that some improvements had been made and the warning notice had been met. The provider was no longer in breach of regulation in relation to staffing and safe care and treatment. However, the provider was in continued breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance and dignity and respect.
We observed some kind and caring interactions between people and staff. It was clear that staff knew people well and had built good relationships. We also observed some more task-based interactions with some staff at busier times. Feedback from people and relatives was positive about how caring staff and the management were. Our observation outcomes were mixed in relation support at mealtimes and in relation to treating people with dignity. Some people did not always look well kempt and had unclean fingernails, teeth and unclean clothing. We were not assured that care records were accurate in relation to people receiving baths and showers on a regular basis.
Improvements were found in risk assessments and care plans for people’s individual needs, and these were reviewed regularly. Care documentation was more robust, detailed and person-centred. However, we found concerns in relation to people who needed enhanced care provision in relation to their nutrition and weight, wound care documentation and managing people’s distress due to their condition.
Refurbishments of the home had taken place since the last inspection such as redecoration and a new reception area. We found safety checks had been carried out. However, we had some concerns relating to environmental safety and access to unsuitable areas. We also had some infection control concerns regarding bathrooms, and some odours were still present in the home.
People’s mental capacity had been assessed and where appropriate, best interest decisions had been recorded. We discussed concerns with the registered manager around the approach to the significant use of sensor beams to alert staff of people’s movements.
The provision of activities at the home had improved significantly since the last inspection, with many events regularly taking place. An activity co-ordinator was now in place and was caring and enthusiastic and worked hard to provide a programme of activities to enhance people’s wellbeing. However, we found the homes outside space was poor and the provision of 1:1 activities and dementia-specific activities required improvement. The registered manager told us of their plans to improve both 1:1 activities and ensure the home was more dementia-friendly, including improvements to access to appropriate outside spaces.
Staff told us they had experienced improvements at the home, and the registered manager was supportive and approachable. Training and staff supervision was in place, and competency checks were carried out. Staff retention and morale had increased since the last inspection.
Medicines were managed and administered safely. Storage of medicines was appropriate, and information was in place to safely administer people’s medicines. Effective and appropriate individual care plans were in place in relation to medicines.
It was evident that some improvements had been made since the last inspection and the registered manager had made a significant impact. However, we still found some areas of concern during this inspection and the service remains in breach of 2 regulations. The progress already made by the registered manager needs to be embedded into practice to demonstrate a sustained and continuous improvement. The registered manager was knowledgeable about the specific needs of people with dementia and what good dementia care looks like and is working to make improvements. This needs to be supported by the provider to enable these improvements. The registered manager was helpful, engaged and responsive when we fed back concerns during the inspection.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
Theproviderwas previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to staffing and safe care and treatment. Improvements were found at this assessment, and theproviderwas no longer in breach of these regulations.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
Theproviderwas previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect. Not enough improvement was found at this assessment, and theproviderremained in breach of this regulation.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 24 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 24 August 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 24 August 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 24 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Selina Ali
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)14 inspection reports, latest 27 January 2023. Latest assessment published 24 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Harbour Healthcare LtdBrand: Harbour Healthcare
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07864027 (opens Companies House)
Harbour Healthcare Ltd runs 12 services in England, 4 of them in the North West. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 5 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Harbour Healthcare Ltd
- G Bentley Manor Good. Care home with nursing, Cheshire East
- G Devonshire House and Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Devon, South West
- G Elburton Heights Good. Care home with nursing, Plymouth, South West
- G Gotton Manor Good. Care home with nursing, Somerset, South West
Getting help from Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0161 217 6029, Monday to Friday 8am to 4.30pm. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0161 718 2118
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Hilltop Court Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Hilltop Court Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Hilltop Court Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 50 beds at Hilltop Court Nursing Home.
- When was Hilltop Court Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hilltop Court Nursing Home was published on 24 August 2026.
- Who runs Hilltop Court Nursing Home?
- Hilltop Court Nursing Home is run by Harbour Healthcare Ltd. It runs 12 services in England, 4 of them in the North West.
- What is Hilltop Court Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 24 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0161 480 4844
- Address
- Dodge Hill, Heaton Norris, Stockport, SK4 1RD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bruce Lodge (Good, 0.9 miles away) and The Grange (Good, 0.9 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Heaton Vale Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Bruce Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away
- G The Grange Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Drakelow House Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Newlands Nursing & Residential Home Good, 1.1 miles away