Rated Care Homes

Whetstone Grange

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Whetstone Grange: inspection record

Care home, 38 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.

Whetstone Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Chataway Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Tavey House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Chataway Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    The Manse Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Woodway House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Tavey House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Enderby Grange Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Whetstone

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 November 2025 (assessment visit 15 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 20 August to 1 September 2025

We found 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, and governance.

Staff had not consistently protected people from risks to their health and safety. Managers had not always followed the provider’s policies and procedures when safeguarding incidents occurred. Improvements were needed to the safety of the premises. Staff had not had the training they needed to meet the care needs of all the people using the services. Medicines storage and management were not always safe. Lessons were not always learnt when things went wrong.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Governance systems and audits were not always effective in identifying or addressing areas for improvement. Audits were not completed consistently and some contained inaccurate information. When shortfalls were identified, audits did not always state the action needed to address them. Staff supervisions and appraisals has not taken place in line with the provider’s policies and procedures.

Staff needed training to support people living with certain health conditions. Most people’s healthcare needs were documented in their care plans and staff referred them to GPs and other healthcare professionals when necessary.

People had detailed care plans setting out their physical, mental, emotional, and social needs. However, people were not always receiving the level of personalised care and support their care plans promised.

Information provided to people at the service was not always accessible to them and did not meet their communication needs. Reasonable adjustments had not always been made for people who needed them.

Most staff were caring and kind and treated people with respect. They responded quickly if people needed assistance. There was a lack of activities at the service and most people had nothing to do but watch television.

Staff had limited opportunities to provide feedback, raise concerns, or suggest ways to improve the service.

People's nutritional needs were mostly met. Staff sat with people at mealtimes and ensured they had the support they needed to enjoy their meals. People had mental capacity assessments to determine if they were able to consent to care.

At the time of our inspection there was no registered manager in post. Following our inspection the provider appointed a new manager to oversee the service.

The provider was open and honest about the challenges the service faced. They had listened to people and relatives and in response upgraded the environment and created a secure garden space. They were committed to working with CQC and the local authority to ensure the service improved.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    During this inspection we identified a breach in regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    During this inspection we identified a breach in regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 4 November 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 4 November 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 4 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 11 March 2021. Latest assessment published 4 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02554060 (opens Companies House)

A L A Care Limited runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by A L A Care Limited

  1. G
    Enderby Grange Good. Care home, Leicestershire
  2. G
    ParkHouse Grange Good. Care home, Leicestershire

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Whetstone Grange provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Whetstone Grange as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Whetstone Grange have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 38 beds at Whetstone Grange.
When was Whetstone Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Whetstone Grange was published on 4 November 2025.
Who runs Whetstone Grange?
Whetstone Grange is run by A L A Care Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Whetstone Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 4 November 2025.

Contact

Address
148 Enderby Road, Whetstone, Leicester, LE8 6JJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Chataway Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Tavey House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Chataway Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    The Manse Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Woodway House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Tavey House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Enderby Grange Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Whetstone