Rated Care Homes

Hillside Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in April 2026.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Hillside Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 2 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in April 2026.

Hillside Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elizabeth Court Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Bracken Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Westhill Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Buxton Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Longmead House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Chaldon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 April 2026 (assessment visit 26 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 February to 11 March 2026.

Hillside Care Home is a residential care home registered to provide care and support for up to 2 people. At the time of the assessment, there were 2 people living in the service. The service currently supports people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

We assessed the service against ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People received safe care provided by appropriately recruited and trained staff. Staff knew how to recognise and report safeguarding concerns internally and externally. Risk assessments and care plans contained information for staff to follow to keep people safe.

We identified minor shortfalls in the management of medicines records and in relation to first aid boxes. There were governance systems in place to review the quality of the care provided, however, there were areas of the governance systems which could be improved.

There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs and the environment was clean. People’s needs were assessed before they moved into the service. Staff worked well with healthcare professionals and other external organisations to monitor and improve people’s health. Staff understood their responsibilities in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Staff understood and supported people to live as independent lives as possible and empowered them to take control. Staff told us their workloads were manageable and they felt supported by the provider.
Care records were person-centred and included people’s preferences and needs. Information was available in a format that suited people. The provider understood how barriers to people’s care affected them and were alert to disadvantages. Feedback from healthcare professionals reflected this. The provider worked well with partners and there was a shared direction amongst the staff team. Staff told us they felt able to speak up and have any concerns addressed.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Simlah Panchoo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 27 June 2019. Latest assessment published 14 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Roshan Panchoo runs 3 services, all in the South East. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Roshan Panchoo

  1. G
    Courthill Care Home Good. Care home, Surrey
  2. G
    Westhill Care Home Good. Care home, Surrey

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hillside Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Hillside Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Hillside Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 2 beds at Hillside Care Home.
When was Hillside Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hillside Care Home was published on 14 April 2026.
Who runs Hillside Care Home?
Hillside Care Home is run by Roshan Panchoo. It runs 3 services, all in the South East.
What is Hillside Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01883 341024
Address
259a Coulsdon Road, Caterham, CR3 5QR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elizabeth Court Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Bracken Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Westhill Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Buxton Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Longmead House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Chaldon