Rated Care Homes

Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Good.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 84 of 122

    rated care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, East Riding of Yorkshire

Rated Good in May 2026, down from Outstanding.

Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Emmanuel House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    St Marys Riverside Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rosewood Lodge Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    The Hollies - Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Hesslewood House Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire

See all care homes in Hessle

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 May 2026 (assessment visit 11 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 25 March and 03 April 2026. Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home provides residential care for older people, many of which were living with advanced dementia and/ or complex needs. This service is registered to accommodate up to 34 people. At the time of the assessment there were 29 people living there. We assessed the service due to the age of the previous rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to live in a safe environment where risks to their health, safety and wellbeing were appropriately identified, assessed and managed. Staff demonstrated a clear understanding of safeguarding processes and knew how to recognise, report and respond to concerns. Incidents and accidents were reviewed to support learning and improvement.

Medicines overall were managed safely by trained staff, staffing levels were sufficient to meet people’s needs, and recruitment practices helped ensure staff were suitable for their roles. The premises and equipment were wellmaintained, with regular safety checks and action plans in place to address identified risks, supported by effective management oversight.

People’s care and support needs were assessed, planned and delivered effectively to achieve positive outcomes and maintain wellbeing. Staff had a good understanding of people’s individual needs and preferences and used person‑centred care plans to provide consistent care. People were supported to maintain good nutrition, hydration and access to healthcare, with timely involvement of relevant professionals. Staff received appropriate training and worked well together to monitor and respond to changes in people’s needs. Care was delivered in line with recognised best practice.

Care was a particular strength of the service and reflected outstanding practice. People were treated with exceptional kindness, compassion and respect, and care was deeply personalised, empowering and inclusive. Strong, trusting relationships were evident between staff, people and their families, creating a genuine sense of home, belonging and emotional safety. Staff consistently went above and beyond to understand what mattered most to people, promoting dignity, independence and meaningful outcomes.

Overall, the provider invested in staff wellbeing as a cornerstone of compassionate care. By enabling staff to feel valued, emotionally supported and professionally confident, the service achieved consistently exceptional caring outcomes for people.

People received care that was responsive to their individual needs, preferences and changing circumstances. Care was flexible and regularly reviewed to ensure it continued to reflect people’s wishes and choices. Staff turnover was extremely low. This supported staff to get to know people well and respond promptly and appropriately to requests for support. This provided continuity of care to maximise positive experiences. People and relatives felt listened to, involved in decisions and confident that concerns or complaints would be addressed appropriately.

The provider and registered manager had oversight to ensure the service was well led, with a strong values‑driven culture and visible, inclusive leadership. Staff felt supported, valued and motivated, and there was a clear emphasis on teamwork, reflection and continuous improvement. Governance systems were effective in monitoring quality and safety, with feedback from people, relatives and staff used to drive learning and improvement. Overall, leadership and management provided clear direction and oversight, supporting the delivery of consistently good care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained Outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; people and their families were empowered to be involved in bespoke care and support planning that demonstrated exceptional outcomes for people.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Emma Mountain
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 20 March 2018. Latest assessment published 29 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02003154 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from East Riding of Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home.
When was Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home was published on 29 May 2026.
Who runs Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home?
Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home is run by Hessle Properties Limited.
What is Woodleigh Manor Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01482 359919
Address
Woodleigh Manor, Westhill, Hessle, HU13 0ER Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Emmanuel House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    St Marys Riverside Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rosewood Lodge Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    The Hollies - Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Hesslewood House Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire

See all care homes in Hessle