Jonathan House
- Care home
- 7 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Westbury on Trym, Bristol, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2014.
7 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
79 of 83
rated care homes in Bristol are rated Good, like this one.
Jonathan House: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2020.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Hyde Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Belvedere Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Glenview Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Meadowcare Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Stokeleigh Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 12 March 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Jonathan House is a care home providing accommodation and personal care to a maximum of seven people who have learning disabilities, autistic spectrum conditions or additional needs. At the time of the inspection seven people were receiving care and support at the service.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.
What inspectors found
At the last inspection, some improvements were required to meet infection control requirements. At this inspection, the provider had carried out extensive building work and now met all safety and infection control requirements.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service was exceptionally responsive because support was tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care. Staff always supported people to feel in control of their lives and respected people's choices.
People and their relatives used a range of methods to provide very regular feedback. They felt their concerns were listened to and appropriate responses received. Technology and alternative methods of communication enabled people to access information in the way they preferred and understood.
People were very actively supported to follow their interests and take part in a wide range of meaningful activities within the service and the community. These reflected their preferences, social and cultural needs and improved their confidence and self-esteem. People accessed a variety of opportunities and lived as full a life as they wished. Staff understood the importance of people taking part in socially and culturally relevant activities and were extremely flexible in supporting people.
People were safe and protected from avoidable harm or abuse. Staff understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding. The service had systems in place to keep people safe and where risks had been identified, actions were taken to manage risks where possible. Staff supported people to manage their medicines safely.
People were supported by regular staff who knew them well. Staff were safely recruited and received training which equipped them to effectively carry out the requirements of their job. Staff felt supported and
received regular supervision.
Care plans were personal, detailed and regularly reviewed. These reflected people's assessed needs and gave staff guidance about what people could do for themselves and how best to provide support.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.
People's healthcare needs were identified, and routine and specialist healthcare services were regularly accessed. Staff worked with other agencies and professionals to ensure people received effective care which met their needs. People were encouraged to have a balanced diet in order to remain healthy.
People were supported by caring and compassionate staff who treated them with dignity and respect. All the feedback we received about the service, staff and the registered manager was positive.
The registered manager was keen to continually improve and develop the service. Governance systems were in place to monitor quality and performance and actions were taken when shortfalls were identified.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Rebecca Lillie
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 12 March 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Freeways
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02209114 (opens Companies House)
Freeways runs 5 services, all in the South West. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Freeways
- G Hillsborough House Good. Care home, Bath and North East Somerset
- G Leigh Court Centre Good. Home care, North Somerset
- G Miller Farm Good. Care home, North Somerset
- G Susan Hampshire House Good. Care home, South Gloucestershire
Getting help from Bristol City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Bristol City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0117 922 2700
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Bristol City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Jonathan House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Jonathan House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Jonathan House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Jonathan House.
- When was Jonathan House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Jonathan House was published on 12 March 2020.
- Who runs Jonathan House?
- Jonathan House is run by Freeways. It runs 5 services, all in the South West.
- What is Jonathan House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 March 2020.
Contact
- Phone
- 0117 973 6361
- Address
- 19 Bayswater Avenue, Westbury Park, Bristol, BS6 7NU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Hyde Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Belvedere Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Glenview Nursing Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Meadowcare Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Stokeleigh Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away