Rated Care Homes

Lynbrook

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 306 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

Lynbrook: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Lancashire

Rated Good in April 2026.

Lynbrook: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Bungalow Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Hennel Lane Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Willowbrooke Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Lostock Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Walton House Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Bamber Bridge

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 April 2026 (assessment visit 23 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 05, 16 March 2026. Lynbrook is registered to provide accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care for up to 4 older people, younger adults or people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture.’ This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence, and access to local communities that most people take for granted. This is the first assessment for this service.

The provider and management were committed to ensuring people were safe and staff had the training and skills to support people using the least restrictive options. Staff were aware of their responsibilities to raise concerns with the safeguarding authorities if they felt people were at risk of harm or abuse.

Staff told us they had received suitable training that had increased their competence and skills. The provider had systems to audit the service delivered, review incidents, and safeguarding processes were robust.

Systems in place ensured medicines were managed safely. However, in relation to one ‘as and when required’ medicine these processes were not consistently followed. The manager took immediate action to ensure the management of this medicine was safe.

Safe recruitment practices were in place and staffing levels reflected the level of support people had been commissioned for by the local authority. They worked with the local authority to help ensure people’s individual staffing levels were reflective of their needs.

People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked to support smooth transitions when moving between services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living.

Staff involved appropriate specialists to help make important decisions that were in people’s best interests. However, 1 person deemed to lack capacity had no support to represent their wishes ensuring they had a voice regarding their care. The manager has since applied for an advocate to represent the person. They have also introduced safeguards to review any decisions made on behalf of the person to ensure they are in their best interests.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jade Gregory
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Progress Adult Services LimitedBrand: Priory Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03545816 (opens Companies House)

Progress Adult Services Limited runs 7 services, all in the North West. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Progress Adult Services Limited

  1. G
    Dixons Farm Good. Care home, Lancashire
  2. G
    Fernleigh House Good. Care home, Lancashire
  3. G
    Long Lane Farm Good. Care home, Lancashire
  4. G
    The Bungalow Good. Care home, Lancashire

See all 7 services run by Progress Adult Services Limited

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lynbrook provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lynbrook as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lynbrook have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Lynbrook.
When was Lynbrook last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lynbrook was published on 20 April 2026.
Who runs Lynbrook?
Lynbrook is run by Progress Adult Services Limited. It runs 7 services, all in the North West.
What is Lynbrook's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01772 697441
Address
106 Todd Lane North, Lostock Hall, Preston, PR5 5UQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Bungalow Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Hennel Lane Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Willowbrooke Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Lostock Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Walton House Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Bamber Bridge