Fernleigh House
- Care home
- 6 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Midge Hall, Lancashire, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
306 of 381
rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.
Fernleigh House: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Bannister Farm Cottage Good, 0.5 miles away
- O Tree Top View Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
- G Paradise House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Sandy Banks Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Lostock Grove Rest Home Good, 0.9 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 July 2026 (assessment visit 18 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 30 June 2026 and 1 July 2026. Fernleigh House is a residential service that can support up to 6 people who may be living with a learning disability and/or autism in one building. At the time of the assessment 6 people were living at the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Care was person centred and focused on people’s goals and aspirations. People were able to give feedback on their care and shape this to meet their needs and preferences. Staff knew people well and supported them to participate in individual areas of interest. Staff supported people to communicate, engage in their preferred areas of interest and build upon their individual skills. People’s independence was consistently promoted to enable people to achieve their best outcomes and achieve their goals.
Medicines were exceptionally well managed. Best practice guidance was explored and followed to help ensure people received medicines in a person-centred way that met their needs.
We found the service was clean, secure and well maintained. Equipment was serviced regularly and checks were carried out to help ensure it was fit to use.
There was a positive and open culture that supported continuous learning and improvement. The registered manager reviewed the provider’s other services and shared best practice information to drive improvement and support positive change. The provider also empowered people to shape the service provided through co-production working. Risks were identified, assessed, documented and managed. Audits and checks identified shortfalls and drove improvements. Staff told us they were confident in the registered manager and the management team.
Recruitment checks were carried out to help ensure prospective employees were suitable to work with people who may be vulnerable. Staff completed appropriate training and had regular meetings with their manager to access ongoing support and guidance. Staffing was arranged so people’s needs and wishes were met whenever possible.
People were referred to external health professionals if needed. Information was shared effectively with other relevant health professionals to support people’s wellbeing. People were involved in menu planning and provided with a choice of meals, snacks and drinks were available if people wanted these.
When restrictions were required to help maintain people’s safety, these were made lawfully. Staff were aware of the type of restrictions that may occur in a care service and said they would report any concerns to the registered manager.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity and treated them respectfully. People were supported to maintain relationships with family and friends if they wished to do so. Staff were aware of their responsibilities to raise concerns with the safeguarding authorities if they felt people were at risk of harm or abuse and knew the different ways concerns could be raised.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last comprehensive assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lynn Lancaster
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 3 January 2018. Latest assessment published 30 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Progress Adult Services LimitedBrand: Priory Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03545816 (opens Companies House)
Progress Adult Services Limited runs 7 services, all in the North West. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Progress Adult Services Limited
- G Dixons Farm Good. Care home, Lancashire
- G Long Lane Farm Good. Care home, Lancashire
- G Lynbrook Good. Care home, Lancashire
- G The Bungalow Good. Care home, Lancashire
Getting help from Lancashire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lancashire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 6720. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 6722
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lancashire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Fernleigh House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Fernleigh House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Fernleigh House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Fernleigh House.
- When was Fernleigh House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Fernleigh House was published on 30 July 2026.
- Who runs Fernleigh House?
- Fernleigh House is run by Progress Adult Services Limited. It runs 7 services, all in the North West.
- What is Fernleigh House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01772 451099
- Address
- 1 Fernleigh, Leyland, PR26 7AW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Bannister Farm Cottage Good, 0.5 miles away
- O Tree Top View Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
- G Paradise House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Sandy Banks Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Lostock Grove Rest Home Good, 0.9 miles away