SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road
- Care home
- 5 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Brandwood End, Birmingham, West Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.
7 months
since the latest rating was published.
184 of 245
rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.
SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G SENSE - 2 and 10 Grove Road Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Eden Lodge Health Care Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Rosemary Lodge Rest Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Chesterwood Good, 0.6 miles away
- G SENSE - 5 Shalnecote Grove Good, 0.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 March 2026 (assessment visit 8 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 20 to 28 January 2026. Sense - 58 Featherstone Road is a specialist residential care home that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. Sense - 58 Featherstone Road can accommodate and provide personal care to 5 people.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service met the requirements of the ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance and promoted people’s rights, independence and equality
We carried out this inspection after a series of concerns were raised with us regarding safety and management at the location. At the time of our inspection there was no evidence the concerns raised were substantiated.
People experienced positive, person‑centred support. Relatives consistently told us staff knew their family members well, respected their individual needs and preferences and supported them to make day‑to‑day choices. Staff promoted people's dignity, independence and rights, and people had access to activities they enjoyed both at home and in the community. Relatives said communication was open and responsive and staff involved them appropriately in people’s care.
People were protected from avoidable harm, and staff understood how to recognise and respond to safeguarding risks. Risk assessments and communication passports helped staff support people safely, including when they moved between services. Staff were recruited safely, and people received their medicines as prescribed. The environment was clean and well maintained, and the provider responded proactively to updates and changes in guidance, for example, fire safety requirements. The service was compliant with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA), and appropriate assessments, best‑interest decisions and applications for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) had been completed in line with legal requirements.
Staff recognised changes in people’s health and sought timely input from healthcare partners. Care plans were personalised and regularly reviewed. People were supported to express their preferences and plan for the future, including important decisions about end of life care. The service met the Accessible Information Standard, and staff ensured people received information in formats matched to their individual communication needs.
During this inspection we found improvements in leadership and governance, although further work was ongoing to embed these changes. Leaders had addressed cultural issues that had previously affected the service and had taken steps to rebuild a positive, values‑led environment. Staff and relatives told us morale and teamwork had improved, and staff felt more supported and confident. Governance systems were in place and were used to monitor quality, respond to feedback and maintain oversight of key risks. The manager was in the process of registering with the Commission, and the management team demonstrated insight into areas which requiring continued strengthening.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm. -
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Aimee Shaw
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 20 February 2020. Latest assessment published 11 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- SenseBrand: Sense - The National Deafblind and Rubella Association
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01825301 (opens Companies House)
- Charity number
- 289868
Sense runs 37 services in England, 11 of them in the West Midlands. 33 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Sense
- O SENSE - 32a Broadgate Lane Outstanding. Care home, Lincolnshire, East Midlands
- O SENSE - 89 Hastings Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Kent, South East
- G Otterhayes Good. Care home, Devon, South West
- G SENSE - 1 Ashley Green Good. Care home, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
Getting help from Birmingham City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Birmingham City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0121 303 1234
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Birmingham City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road.
- When was SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road was published on 11 March 2026.
- Who runs SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road?
- SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road is run by Sense. It runs 37 services in England, 11 of them in the West Midlands.
- What is SENSE - 58 Featherstone Road's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 March 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0121 444 6600
- Address
- Kings Heath, Birmingham, B14 6BE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G SENSE - 2 and 10 Grove Road Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Eden Lodge Health Care Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Rosemary Lodge Rest Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Chesterwood Good, 0.6 miles away
- G SENSE - 5 Shalnecote Grove Good, 0.6 miles away