Rated Care Homes

Withins (Breightmet) Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in March 2026.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 9 of 55

    rated care homes in Bolton are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Withins (Breightmet) Limited: inspection record

Care home, 65 beds, Bolton

Rated Requires improvement in March 2026.

Withins (Breightmet) Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Southlands Residential Home Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bright Meadows (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Southlands Residential Home Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bright Meadows Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Laburnum Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    New Lane Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Bolton

See all care homes in Breightmet

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 March 2026 (assessment visit 5 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment was carried out between 7 January 2026 and 26 January 2026.

Withins (Breightmet) Limited is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 65 people in a purpose – built building over 3 floors.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group and has provided care to autistic people and people with a learning disability in the past.

There were 2 breaches of regulation identified in relation to medication management and good governance.

The provider did not manage medicines in line with best practice, and a breach of regulation was identified. The provider had breached regulations at the previous 3 inspections regarding medicines management. Key staff did not have the appropriate medicines training to be completing competency assessments with staff. Staff did not have advanced autism or learning disability training, despite them being registered to support people with these needs. The provider’s risk assessments and care plans lacked detail and were not person centred. There was a lack of evidence of how safety incidents had resulted in lessons learned. However, the provider did ensure safe transitions into the service.

Staff assessed people’s needs, but these were not always being met or documented well. The provider did not have robust systems and processes regarding consent to care, including best interest decisions not being recorded.

The provider ensured people could live as independently as reasonably possible, and they had choice and control over their care and treatment. However, consent processes needed improving.

The provider did not ensure people’s care plans and risk assessments were person centred. However, the provider ensured people were all treated equally and had a good understanding of the types of discrimination they may face.

The provider’s governance systems and processes were not robust, and a breach of regulation was identified. The provider did not always focus on continuous learning and improvement across the organisation. However, staff felt respected, supported and valued. Staff were clear on their roles and accountabilities, and the provider engaged well with people and the community to plan and manage the service.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

We have also asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns regarding good governance found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At this assessment we reviewed 5 quality statements from this key question. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were managed safely at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At this assessment we reviewed 2 quality statements from this key question. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At this assessment we reviewed 1 quality statement from this key question. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At this assessment we reviewed 2 quality statements from this key question. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    The last time we rated well led, we rated it as requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained. This meant there needed to be improvement made to ensure there were robust governance arrangements.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 2 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 March 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Samuel Shahbazi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 6 June 2023. Latest assessment published 2 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03717715 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Bolton Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Withins (Breightmet) Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Withins (Breightmet) Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Withins (Breightmet) Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 65 beds at Withins (Breightmet) Limited.
When was Withins (Breightmet) Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Withins (Breightmet) Limited was published on 2 March 2026.
Who runs Withins (Breightmet) Limited?
Withins (Breightmet) Limited is run by Withins (Breightmet) Limited.
What is Withins (Breightmet) Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 2 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01204 362626
Address
38-40 Withins Lane, Breightmet, Bolton, BL2 5DZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Southlands Residential Home Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bright Meadows (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Southlands Residential Home Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bright Meadows Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Laburnum Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    New Lane Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Bolton

See all care homes in Breightmet