Rated Care Homes

Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 133 of 151

    rated care homes in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Wiltshire

Rated Good in January 2026.

Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Pennings View Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    St Patrick's House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Camelot Care Homes Ltd Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Amesbury Abbey Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willow House Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Wiltshire

See all care homes in Amesbury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 January 2026 (assessment visit 16 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection 8 and 13 October 2025. The service is a care home providing support to people with a learning disability and autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, Right care, Right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service due to the length of time since we last visited them and completed a comprehensive inspection.

We found people were being supported in an exceptionally person-centred way by a consistent staff team who knew and understood people’s needs. Leaders had created a culture that ensured people understood they had choice and control over all aspects of their lives. People were supported and empowered to engage with their local community. This included local services such as doctors, dentists, opticians and social settings. The provider supported people who struggled to meet with their friends by creating a friendship group that met regularly. This enabled people to socially engage with others and have a community presence using local facilities such as coffee shops.

Staff were passionate about making sure people were leading a fulfilling life doing activities they wanted to do. There was a strong ethos of person-centred care at the service and staff and leaders consistently supported people to express their individuality and have personalised support consistently.

The provider ensured there was a strong learning culture which focused on continuous development. They enhanced this by identifying extra training for staff including managing the menopause. This enhanced the life experiences of the women at the service both staff and people. Leaders and staff worked in an exceptional way with heath care professionals to ensure people’s human rights were promoted and they had fair and timely access to health care. Leaders made sure there was no experiences of discrimination for people in all aspects of their lives.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Laura Foley
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2018. Latest assessment published 6 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way.
When was Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way was published on 6 January 2026.
Who runs Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way?
Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way is run by Sharon and Glen Arnott.
What is Sharon and Glen Arnott - 32 Beamont Way's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 January 2026.

Contact

Phone
01980 676788
Address
Beamont Way, Amesbury, Salisbury, SP4 7UA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Pennings View Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    St Patrick's House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Camelot Care Homes Ltd Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Amesbury Abbey Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willow House Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Wiltshire

See all care homes in Amesbury