Ilford Park Polish Home
- Care home
- 95 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Devon, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
8 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
232 of 283
rated care homes in Devon are rated Good, like this one.
Ilford Park Polish Home: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2019.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Asher Care Good, 1.9 miles away
- G Southlands Residential Care Home Good, 2.2 miles away
- RI Mulberry House Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
- G Mapleton Good, 2.3 miles away
- G Meadowside Residential Home Good, 2.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 5 March 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service: Ilford Park Polish Home is a residential care home that provides personal and nursing care for up to 95 people who qualify for admission under the 1947 Polish Resettlement Act. At the time of our inspection there were 80 people living at Ilford Park.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People's experience of using this service: • The service met characteristics of good in all areas. • The service had safe systems around safeguarding and risk assessment and implemented the least restrictive principle to promote people's safety and rights. • People and relatives told us staff were kind and caring and they felt well cared for. They could express their views about the service and provide feedback. • People were treated with dignity and respect. • People were supported to take their medicines in a safe way, but handwritten changes to medicines records were not always recorded and signed by two members of staff. We made a recommendation to the provider about this. • People were assisted to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems at the service supported this practice. • There was enough staff on duty at the right time to enable people to receive care in a timely way. • The provider had procedures in place to ensure potential staff were suitable to work at the service. We made a recommendation to the provider about reviewing their recruitment policies. • Staff received appropriate training and support to enable them to perform their roles effectively. • People's care was personalised to their individual needs. Some care plans, daily records and risk assessments would benefit from further person-centred information to ensure staff had the information they needed to provide responsive care. • People were supported by staff to maintain good nutrition and hydration. • We received mixed feedback about the meals provided by the home. Food was discussed at resident's meetings and the chef regularly met with people. The menus were under review to ensure they reflected people's choices. • Staff worked well with external professionals to ensure people were supported to access health services and had their health care needs met. • The service provided a variety of activities in line with people's interests and encouraged people's involvement. • The environment was comfortable and was adapted to meet people's needs. • Management and staff demonstrated a good understanding of and response to people's diverse needs. • Appropriate governance processes were in place to ensure high quality care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Ambika Prasad
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 5 March 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Defence Business Services
- Ownership type
- Organisation
Getting help from Devon County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Devon County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 155 1007, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4pm
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Ilford Park Polish Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Ilford Park Polish Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Ilford Park Polish Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 95 beds at Ilford Park Polish Home.
- When was Ilford Park Polish Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ilford Park Polish Home was published on 5 March 2019.
- Who runs Ilford Park Polish Home?
- Ilford Park Polish Home is run by Defence Business Services.
- What is Ilford Park Polish Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 March 2019.
Contact
- Phone
- 01626 353961
- Address
- Stover, Newton Abbot, TQ12 6QH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Asher Care Good, 1.9 miles away
- G Southlands Residential Care Home Good, 2.2 miles away
- RI Mulberry House Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
- G Mapleton Good, 2.3 miles away
- G Meadowside Residential Home Good, 2.6 miles away