Rated Care Homes

Springkell House Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Springkell House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 35 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in November 2025.

Springkell House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crest Lodge Care Centre Limited Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    The Pines Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Whitmore Vale House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Moorhouse Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Huntington House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Beacon Hill

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 November 2025 (assessment visit 22 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 11 September 2025

Springkell House Care Home [Springkell House] is a care home without nursing for up to 35 older people and people living with dementia. There were 27 people living at Springkell House when we visited.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The assessment took place due to concerns raised regarding delays in making health referrals for people when required. We found the provider had put measures in place to address the concerns, implemented systems to minimise risks going forward and provided support to the staff team. We received positive feedback from healthcare professionals regarding how the concerns had been addressed. During our assessment we found some areas which required on-going improvement in relation to how generic risks were monitored and how responses to suggestions were actioned and recorded. The provider assured us they had already identified these concerns and provided evidence of how they were addressing the issues.

People were safe and along with their relatives, were involved in initial assessments, care planning and making decisions regarding their day-to-day care and support. Staff knew people well and were aware of risks to their safety and well-being. Accidents, incidents and complaints were acted upon and monitored to help ensure they did not happen again. People received their medicines as prescribed, and staff received training in how to support people with their medicines safely. Staff understood their responsibilities to keep people safe from harm and abuse and safeguarding concerns were reported and investigated appropriately.

Staff were recruited safely and received an induction, on-going training and regular supervision to support them in their roles. Staff felt supported and valued by the management team and systems were in place to thank staff for the support they provided to people. Staff had the opportunity to provide feedback on the service and felt they were listened to.

A registered manager was in post who had worked at the service in a number of different roles. They demonstrated commitment to developing a positive, person-centred culture which respected people’s diverse needs. Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service and support people received and to ensure continued learning and improvement.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jozef Tomko
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 13 September 2023. Latest assessment published 25 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03454605 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Springkell House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Springkell House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Springkell House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 35 beds at Springkell House Care Home.
When was Springkell House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Springkell House Care Home was published on 25 November 2025.
Who runs Springkell House Care Home?
Springkell House Care Home is run by Madeprice Limited.
What is Springkell House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 25 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01428 605509
Address
Springkell House, Wood Road, Hindhead, GU26 6PT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crest Lodge Care Centre Limited Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    The Pines Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Whitmore Vale House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Moorhouse Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Huntington House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Beacon Hill