Rated Care Homes

Smithy Forge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 18 of 24

    rated care homes in Halton are rated Good, like this one.

Smithy Forge: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Halton

Rated Good in August 2026.

Smithy Forge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norton Lodge Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
  4. RI
    St Lukes Care Home Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Croftwood Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Halton

See all care homes in Town Park

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 August 2026 (assessment visit 9 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Our view of the service

About the service

Smithy Forge is a care home. There were 2 people using the service at the time of the inspection, with 1 person receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This is a specialist service for people with a learning disability and autistic people. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 9 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People were supported by staff, who had the skills and knowledge to provide effective support. Many of the staff team had worked at the service for a long time, so people were supported by staff who knew their needs exceptionally well. People told us how highly they thought of staff and how much they valued having a key worker. A relative confirmed staff were caring and how this made them feel their loved one was cared for in a safe and compassionate way.

People received their medicines when they needed them, and by staff who were trained and competent.

Staff understood their responsibility to safeguard people from the risk of abuse; they were knowledgeable about what concerns they would need to report and to whom.

Risks to people were identified and risk assessments had been carried out to manage and mitigate risks.

People had opportunities to spend time at the service prior to moving in, this was part of the assessment process, and helped people transition more seamlessly. An external professional who worked with the service commented how staff positively supported and engaged with both people and their families during the transition process.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control over their lives. Wherever possible, people were at the centre of the planning and review of their support; to help ensure they received person centred care in line with their preferences, choices and needs. People told us they were consistently offered choice.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. Staff and management worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice control and freedom over their lives. A member of staff confirmed, “People living here have choices every day, we support people in making choices, to do the things they want to do.”

People were supported by caring and compassionate staff who promoted choices in a way people understood. We observed staff spoke to people with warmth and dignity. Staff promoted people’s independence in all areas of their life to ensure people lived the life they wanted. A member of staff told us, “This is what it is all about, we are supporting people to live their best lives and to do what they want to do, and this respects their independence.”

The provider’s vision was shared and adopted by staff. This focused on person centred care, independence and advocating for the best possible care for people. A member of staff commented, “When I am coming to work, I feel like I am coming to see family. We work very well as a team.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lynn Price
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 7 February 2018. Latest assessment published 17 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
D & L Price
Ownership type
Partnership

D & L Price runs 2 services, all in the North West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by D & L Price

  1. G
    Wide Cove Good. Care home, Halton

Getting help from Halton Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Smithy Forge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Smithy Forge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Smithy Forge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Smithy Forge.
When was Smithy Forge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Smithy Forge was published on 17 August 2026.
Who runs Smithy Forge?
Smithy Forge is run by D & L Price. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
What is Smithy Forge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01928 790986
Address
3a Norton Village, Norton, Runcorn, WA7 6PZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norton Lodge Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
  4. RI
    St Lukes Care Home Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Croftwood Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Halton

See all care homes in Town Park