Richardson Court
- Care home
- 9 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Barrowhill, Kent, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
7 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
332 of 445
rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.
Richardson Court: inspection record
Rated Good in March 2020, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G May Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
- G May Morning Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Belmont Good, 1.6 miles away
- RI HF Trust - Lympne Place (High Trees and The Beeches) Requires improvement, 1.9 miles away
- G Homelands Good, 2.8 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 March 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Richardson Court is a care home that provides personal care for up to nine people with a learning disability. At the time of the inspection eight people lived at the service. The service was split between a main house which six people lived in and a cottage within the grounds of the main house which two people lived in. The main house was split over two floors, all bedrooms were single occupancy, one with ensuite facilities and other people had a private hand wash basin. The cottage was split over two floors and had three bedrooms. People living in either the Court or Cottage had access to communal bathrooms, lounge, dining room, kitchen and garden.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them. People's participation within the local community was encouraged and enabled.
What inspectors found
Since our last inspection maintenance work had been carried out to improve the environment. Some further cosmetic work was required. However, the service was warm, safe and had homely touches throughout. People were supported to stay safe. Risks were assessed, monitored, reviewed and staff understood how to recognise abuse and the processes to follow should they have any concerns. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to identify any patterns or trends so any lessons could be learnt. There were enough staff to meet people's needs and staff had a good knowledge of the people they supported. Medicines were managed safely, and staff were competency checked to ensure mistakes were minimised.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Peoples needs were assessed before they moved in to the service and further assessments made to meet people's needs. Peoples capacity to make specific decisions was assessed and best interest decisions made with the involvement of other important individuals. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence. People chose their own food and drink and staff knew how to support people with specific eating and drinking requirements. Staff were trained and knowledgeable about their roles. People were supported to remain well and healthy.
People's privacy and dignity was respected, people were encouraged to be independent. Peoples diversities were considered and respected. We observed people being encouraged and supported to make their own
choices and decisions. Staff spoke to people in a kind and considerate way, people appeared relaxed in their home and freely moved around the service.
Care plans reflected people's needs, guidance was implemented so staff knew how to offer support in a consistent way. Relatives were communicated with and involved in their loved one's care. People took part in various activities and outings. Peoples communication needs were assessed, and staff knew how to communicate with people in their preferred way. No complaints had been made since the last inspection. A complaints procedure described how people could make a complaint or raise a concern, an easy read version was available.
There was an open and inclusive culture in the service. The registered manager encouraged staff and other individuals to feedback what could change so the service could improve. Monitoring of staff performance was more robust. Auditing was in place which identified any areas of concern and action was taken in response to this.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Amanda Maudave De Mezieres
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 19 March 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Counticare LimitedBrand: CareTech Community Services
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02585666 (opens Companies House)
Counticare Limited runs 11 services, all in the South East. 11 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Counticare Limited
- G Anderida Good. Care home, Kent
- G Belmont Good. Care home, Kent
- G Carlile Lodge Good. Care home, Kent
- G Cosy Lodge Good. Care home, Kent
Getting help from Kent County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Kent County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 03000 41 61 61, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Kent County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Richardson Court provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Richardson Court as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Richardson Court have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Richardson Court.
- When was Richardson Court last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Richardson Court was published on 19 March 2020.
- Who runs Richardson Court?
- Richardson Court is run by Counticare Limited. It runs 11 services, all in the South East.
- What is Richardson Court's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 March 2020.
Contact
- Phone
- 01303 814821
- Address
- Main Road, Sellindge, TN25 6JD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G May Lodge Good, 0.4 miles away
- G May Morning Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Belmont Good, 1.6 miles away
- RI HF Trust - Lympne Place (High Trees and The Beeches) Requires improvement, 1.9 miles away
- G Homelands Good, 2.8 miles away