Rated Care Homes

Wolfe House Care Home

  • Care home
  • 16 beds
  • No nursing
  • Dementia care
  • Registered since 2011
  • Surrey, South East
RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Wolfe House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 16 beds, Surrey

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.

Wolfe House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: David Gresham House (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Ormesby House (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    David Gresham House Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Ormesby House Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Champions Place Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    Windmill Manor Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Tandridge Heights Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 June 2026 (assessment visit 24 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment - 6 May 2026.

Wolfe House Care Home [Wolfe House] is a care home without nursing for up to 16 older people, some of whom were living with a dementia or had a learning disability. There were 15 people living at Wolfe House at the time of assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During our assessment we identified 3 breaches of regulation in relation to the infection prevention, control and cleanliness, person-centred care and good governance. Areas of the home were not cleaned to a hygienic and safe standard, and malodours were present in some areas. The delivery of activities and support for people to occupy their time doing things they enjoyed was not closely monitored and staff had not received sufficient training in this area. Governance systems had not fully assessed people’s experiences in relation to these concerns and audits had not identified these shortfalls. In other areas we found audits were effective in identifying concerns and action taken to make improvements required.

Two people living at Wolfe House had a learning disability. We therefore assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence, and good access to local communities which most people take for granted. The service ensured staff received training in supporting people with a learning disability, although the needs of the individuals as older people were understood and met by staff.

People, along with their relatives, were involved in initial assessments, care planning and making decisions regarding their day-to-day care and support. Accidents and incidents were reviewed and acted upon to help ensure they did not happen again. Staff received training in medicines administration and people received their medicines in line with their prescriptions. Staff understood their responsibilities to keep people safe from harm and abuse and safeguarding concerns were reported and reviewed to minimise risks.

Staff were recruited safely and received an induction, on-going training and regular supervision to support them in their roles. Staff were kind and considerate during individual interactions with people.

The registered manager demonstrated commitment to developing the service and had an open and transparent approach. Following our assessment, they forwarded an action plan to highlight how they intended to address the shortfalls identified through our assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation tosystems in safe infection prevention and control processes and the cleanliness of the home.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 3 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Chelsea Hudson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 29 December 2018. Latest assessment published 3 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05999353 (opens Companies House)

Wolfe House Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Wolfe House Limited

  1. G
    Abbey Dean Good. Care home, West Sussex

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wolfe House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wolfe House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Wolfe House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 16 beds at Wolfe House Care Home.
When was Wolfe House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wolfe House Care Home was published on 3 June 2026.
Who runs Wolfe House Care Home?
Wolfe House Care Home is run by Wolfe House Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
What is Wolfe House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01883 716627
Address
Wolf's Row, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: David Gresham House (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Ormesby House (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    David Gresham House Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Ormesby House Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Champions Place Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    Windmill Manor Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Tandridge Heights Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey