Rated Care Homes

Alpha House - Huddersfield

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 26 of 119

    rated care homes in Kirklees are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Alpha House - Huddersfield: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Kirklees

Rated Requires improvement in July 2019, down from Good.

Alpha House - Huddersfield: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Abbey Care Village (Good, 0.5 miles away) and St Anne's, Huddersfield Mental Health Services (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Abbey Care Village Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Trabel Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Gables Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Bridge House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Huddersfield

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 25 July 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Alpha House is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care to three people with autism and/or a learning disability. The service can support up to four people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

Medicine management had not always followed best practice and audits had not identified areas which required improving. Day staff had been trained to administer medicines and had their competency assessed. Night staff had not been trained and although this had not presented an issue, it had been highlighted as a requirement but not yet actioned.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Some improvements were required in how the service assessed and managed risk, as some risks were managed well, but others had not been identified to ensure the necessary risk reduction measures were in place.

Improvements were needed in how the service recorded behaviours that challenged others. More detailed records would help ensure the effectiveness of the resources available to reduce these behaviours.

Staff were recruited safely. Staff training, supervision and appraisal were not all up to date.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. However, formal decision specific capacity assessments and best interest decisions had not always been undertaken which meant the service was not acting within the legislative framework.

People were supported to prepare meals of their choice and weights were recorded regularly to ensure their wellbeing. Staff supported people with hospital appointments, and professional visits. Professional advice was sought when required.

People using the service and relatives spoke highly of the caring support provided by the staff and told us people were treated as if they were a member of the family. They were happy with the service provided.

Audits and checks were carried out; however, these were not always effective in identifying areas which needed to be improved. The provider had not notified CQC of significant events as required which showed an issue with the overview of the service.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. Some people's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent. However, for other people the service had identified they needed to look again at their outcomes to ensure goals were continuously reviewed.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 July 2019. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 July 2019. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 25 July 2019. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 July 2019. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amanda Oneill
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 25 July 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Valeo LimitedBrand: CareTech Community Services
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04099715 (opens Companies House)

Valeo Limited runs 9 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Valeo Limited

  1. G
    Cragside Good. Care home, Kirklees
  2. G
    Hascott House Good. Care home, Sheffield
  3. G
    The Lodge Good. Care home, Kirklees
  4. G
    The Old School House Good. Care home, Sheffield

See all 9 services run by Valeo Limited

Getting help from Kirklees Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Alpha House - Huddersfield provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Alpha House - Huddersfield as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Alpha House - Huddersfield have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Alpha House - Huddersfield.
When was Alpha House - Huddersfield last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alpha House - Huddersfield was published on 25 July 2019.
Who runs Alpha House - Huddersfield?
Alpha House - Huddersfield is run by Valeo Limited. It runs 9 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Alpha House - Huddersfield's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 July 2019.

Contact

Phone
01484 422760
Address
122 Halifax Old Road, Birkby, Huddersfield, HD2 2RW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Abbey Care Village (Good, 0.5 miles away) and St Anne's, Huddersfield Mental Health Services (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Abbey Care Village Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Trabel Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Gables Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Bridge House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Huddersfield