Rated Care Homes

The Old School House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 87 of 107

    rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

The Old School House: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Sheffield

Rated Good in July 2018.

The Old School House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norbury Court Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Pexton Grange Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Neu Living Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Wood Hill Grange Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Wood Hill Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Central Sheffield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 24 July 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The Old School House is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Old School House can accommodate up to four people with a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. Accommodation is based over two floors. The home is situated in the S5 area of Sheffield, South Yorkshire near local shops and public transport. At the time of this inspection, four people were living at The Old School House.

There was a manager at the service who was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Our last inspection at The Old School House took place on 19 July 2017. Whilst the service was rated Good overall, we found one breach of the regulations of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. This was a breach of Regulation 18: Staffing.

Following the last inspection, we asked the registered provider to complete an action plan to show what they would do, and by when, to improve the key question asking if the service was effective, to at least good.

This inspection took place on 9 July 2018 and was announced. We gave the registered manager 48 hours' notice of our inspection. We did this because the registered manager is sometimes out of the office at the two other small care homes they manage, and people are often out. We needed to be sure the manager, people receiving support and staff would be available to meet and speak with us.

At this inspection, we found sufficient improvements had been made to meet the requirements of Regulation 18: Staffing, as all staff had been provided with an annual appraisal, as is necessary to enable them to carry out the duties they are employed to perform.

At our last inspection, we rated the service Good. At this inspection, we found the evidence continued to support the rating of Good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and on going monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

At this inspection, we found the service remained Good.

Why the service is rated Good.

People who lived at The Old School House communicated in various ways to tell us they felt safe. Family and friends spoke positively about the standard of care and support people received.

Staff were aware of their responsibilities in keeping people safe.

Policies and procedures for the safe management of medicines were in place.

There were robust recruitment procedures in operation to promote people's safety.

Staff were provided with relevant training and supervision so they had the skills they needed to undertake their role.

People receiving support and their relatives felt staff had the right skills to do their job. They said staff were respectful and caring in their approach.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People's support plans contained relevant person centred information to inform staff. The support plans had been reviewed to ensure they were up to date.

People were confident in reporting concerns to the registered manager and felt they would be listened to.

There were quality assurance and audit processes in place to make sure the service was running well.

The service had a full range of policies and procedures available to staff.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gillian Vickers
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 24 July 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Valeo LimitedBrand: CareTech Community Services
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04099715 (opens Companies House)

Valeo Limited runs 9 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Valeo Limited

  1. G
    Cragside Good. Care home, Kirklees
  2. G
    Hascott House Good. Care home, Sheffield
  3. G
    The Lodge Good. Care home, Kirklees
  4. G
    Trabel Good. Care home, Kirklees

See all 9 services run by Valeo Limited

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Old School House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Old School House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Old School House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at The Old School House.
When was The Old School House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Old School House was published on 24 July 2018.
Who runs The Old School House?
The Old School House is run by Valeo Limited. It runs 9 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is The Old School House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 July 2018.

Contact

Address
2 Norwood Road, Sheffield, S5 7BD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Norbury Court Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Pexton Grange Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Neu Living Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. RI
    Wood Hill Grange Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Wood Hill Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Central Sheffield