Rated Care Homes

Church View Nursing Home

  • Care home
  • 43 beds
  • Nursing care
  • Dementia care
  • Registered since 2011
  • Swindon, South West
G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    First rated Inadequate in 2015, most recently Good in October 2026.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 34 of 43

    rated care homes in Swindon are rated Good, like this one.

Church View Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 43 beds, Swindon

Rated Good in October 2026.

Church View Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Tony Long House No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Wemyss Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    4 Hermitage Lane Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    12A Masefield Avenue Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Fitzwarren House Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Swindon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 October 2026 (assessment visit 23 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Church View Nursing Home is a care home for 43 people. At the time of this assessment there were 35 people living in the home.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This service is a nursing home which provides support to adults with dementia, mental health conditions and physical disabilities.

We carried out this assessment on 28 and 29 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People received safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led care from a staff team with the skills, knowledge and experience to meet their needs. There were enough staff deployed to support people safely, and robust safeguarding, risk management and medicines systems helped protect people from harm. The provider maintained a safe environment through effective health and safety processes, regular servicing of equipment and oversight from a dedicated maintenance team.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, and they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

People's needs were thoroughly assessed before moving into the service and were regularly reviewed to ensure information remained accurate and reflected any changes in their circumstances. Care plans and risk assessments provided staff with clear, person-centred and evidence-based guidance. For example, information was available for people living with specific health conditions such as diabetes, those requiring catheter care, and those using oxygen therapy. The provider was responsive to feedback and acted promptly when minor improvements were identified.

Staff worked proactively with people and healthcare professionals to monitor outcomes and support positive wellbeing, particularly in relation to hydration, nutrition and the prevention and management of pressure wounds. People were encouraged to make choices about their care and support, and staff consistently sought consent and demonstrated a good understanding of people's rights.

People lived in a comfortable and personalised environment. Bedrooms reflected people's individual preferences and interests, helping to promote a sense of belonging and independence. There were effective opportunities for people, relatives and staff to share their views through meetings and feedback processes. People consistently described the service as having an open, inclusive and communicative culture.

The service was able to demonstrate an outstanding caring culture. People, relatives, staff and professionals provided several positive examples of staff treating people with kindness, compassion, dignity and respect. People's independence, choice and control were actively promoted, and staff took the time to understand each person as an individual. Leaders fostered a positive team culture through initiatives such as a senior carer development programme and opportunities for staff to recognise and share examples of good practice, helping to support continuous learning and improvement.

Governance and oversight arrangements were effective in monitoring the quality and safety of the service. Leaders regularly reviewed performance and acted on findings to drive improvement. The service maintained strong links with healthcare professionals and community services, and coordinating support to ensure people’s health and wellbeing needs were met. Overall, leaders were visible, approachable and committed to providing high-quality, person-centred care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Leah Trute
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 12 February 2020. Latest assessment published 27 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04952292 (opens Companies House)

Coate Water Care Company (Church View Nursing Home) Limited runs 5 services in England, 3 of them in the South West. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Coate Water Care Company (Church View Nursing Home) Limited

  1. G
    Chapel House Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Gloucestershire
  2. G
    Mockley Manor Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Warwickshire, West Midlands
  3. G
    Westley Court Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Worcestershire, West Midlands
  4. RI
    Woodstock Nursing Home Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Gloucestershire

Getting help from Swindon Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Church View Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Church View Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Church View Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 43 beds at Church View Nursing Home.
When was Church View Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Church View Nursing Home was published on 27 October 2026.
Who runs Church View Nursing Home?
Church View Nursing Home is run by Coate Water Care Company (Church View Nursing Home) Limited. It runs 5 services in England, 3 of them in the South West.
What is Church View Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01793 820761
Address
Rainer Close, Stratton St Margaret, Swindon, SN3 4YA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Tony Long House No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Wemyss Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    4 Hermitage Lane Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    12A Masefield Avenue Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Fitzwarren House Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Swindon