Rated Care Homes

Red House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 147 of 184

    rated care homes in Gloucestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Red House: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Gloucestershire

Rated Good in October 2019.

Red House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hobbits Holt Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Prospect House Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Milestones Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Apple Orchard Good, 2.4 miles away

See all care homes in Gloucestershire

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 5 October 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Red House is a residential care home providing personal care to five adults with learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorder and/or mental health needs at the time of the inspection. The service is registered to support up to eight people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service has been developed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. The registered manager told us up to seven people could be accommodated as the eighth room was small and used as a staff sleep room. The house is larger than current best practice guidance. However, the building design fitted into the residential area and was in keeping with other large domestic homes in the area. There were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom or cameras outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff did not wear a uniform when supporting people at home and when accessing the wider community with them.

What inspectors found

People felt safe and staff treated them with respect and dignity. People were comfortable and relaxed when interacting with staff and they were happy to ask them for help or support. Staff were trained to meet their needs and had been recruited safely. Risks to people were managed through person-centred support plans, referral to health professionals and regular reviews of their needs.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. When restrictions were needed to maintain people's safety, for example, when going out into the community, the least restrictive approach was taken. Arrangements made on people's behalf were made in line with Mental Capacity Act requirements when people could not consent to decisions about their care

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence. People reviewed their wishes and support needs regularly, with the staff member they chose to work with. Staff were committed to helping people achieve their goals and to ensuring people's disabilities did not prevent them from living a fulfilled and happy life. People were supported to participate in activities they enjoyed and were interested in.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent. People who wanted to work or attend college were supported to do so and staff assisted people with developing life skills, such as cooking. People enjoyed regular visits to their local shop and their favourite places to eat or have drinks out. They had formed relationships with members of their local community through this regular contact. People were supported to maintain relationships with others who were important to them.

The service was caring and person-centred. People using the service and the staff supporting them, were valued and listened to. The provider and registered manager understood their responsibilities and monitored the service to ensure any improvements needed were carried out. The registered manager worked openly and transparently with outside agencies.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Anna Villis
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 5 October 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Parkcare Homes (No.2) LimitedBrand: Priory Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04000281 (opens Companies House)

Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited runs 88 services in England, 17 of them in the South West. 72 are rated Good or Outstanding, 12 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 4 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited

  1. O
    Fitzwilliam Lodge Outstanding. Care home, Rotherham, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. O
    Riverview Outstanding. Care home, Devon
  3. O
    Tree Top View Outstanding. Care home, Lancashire, North West
  4. G
    95 Bromyard Road Good. Care home, Worcestershire, West Midlands

See all 88 services run by Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Red House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Red House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Red House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Red House.
When was Red House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Red House was published on 5 October 2019.
Who runs Red House?
Red House is run by Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited. It runs 88 services in England, 17 of them in the South West.
What is Red House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 October 2019.

Contact

Phone
01594 822100
Address
65 Ruspidge Road, Cinderford, GL14 3AW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hobbits Holt Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Prospect House Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Milestones Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Apple Orchard Good, 2.4 miles away

See all care homes in Gloucestershire