Rated Care Homes

Pathway House

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Outstanding.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 69

    rated care homes in Bedford are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Pathway House: inspection record

Care home, 12 beds, Bedford

Rated Outstanding in July 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Pathway House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cranwell Court Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wyboston Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Marbrook Centre Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Nelson Lodge Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Hillings Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Bedford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 July 2025 (assessment visit 24 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 14th to 30th May 2025.

Pathway House is a care home supporting people who may be autistic or living with a learning disability with personal care. The service can support up to 12 people and 7 people were living at the service at the time of our inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Outstanding
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At our last inspection the service was in breach of 4 regulations of the Health and Social Care Act (2014) in relation to safe care and treatment, person-centred care, dignity and respect and good governance. At this inspection the service had improved and is no longer in breach of any regulations. The service has improved from Requires improvement to Outstanding at this inspection.

The way in which people’s needs had been assessed and reassessed was exceptional and had led to some extremely good experiences and outcomes for people. The management and staff team used best practice guidance to enable people to have the best experiences of support they could have. Staff supported people to live healthy lives in innovative ways, whilst maintaining and respecting their choices. This had a hugely positive impact for people. People were supported in line with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA). Staff were incredibly kind, caring and supportive and were committed to supporting people to live the way they wanted to. People were fully in control of their care and support and staff prioritised supporting them to be as independent as they chose to be. People were treated as individuals and there was a focus on how best to support them with their own personal preferences, likes and dislikes. The positive outcomes people had been supported to achieve as a result of staff support were excellent. People were safe being supported by the staff team. Staff were trained and knew how to report safeguarding concerns. Risks to people had been assessed including in relation to medicines. Staff supported people to take positive risks. There were enough trained and competent staff to support people safely. The environment of the service was safe, and staff followed good infection and prevention control (IPC) procedures. People were supported in line with their preferences and were supported to follow their interests both at the service and in the local community. People’s care plans were clear and detailed, and staff supported people to set and achieve goals that were important to them. The management team had a good oversight of the service and audits were effective in identifying, making and sustaining improvements. There was a positive culture at the service, people were happy with their support and staff enjoyed their job roles.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    People were safe using the service. Staff were trained in safeguarding and knew how to report concerns if necessary. There were enough suitably trained and competent staff to support people. Risks to people were assessed and mitigated as far as possible and people were supported safely with their medicines. Staff supported people to take positive risks and knew how to support people when they were upset or anxious. The environment at the service was safe and staff followed good IPC procedures to help keep the service clean.

  2. Effective

    Outstanding

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to Outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s experiences showed the service as exceptional and distinctive.

    The way in which people’s needs had been assessed and reassessed was exceptional and had led to some extremely good experiences and outcomes for people. The management and staff team used best practice guidance to support people to have the best experiences of support they could have. Staff supported people to live healthy lives in innovative ways, whilst maintaining and respecting their choices. This had a hugely positive impact for people. People were supported in line with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA).

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has changed to Outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

    Staff were incredibly kind, caring and supportive and were committed to supporting people to live the way they wanted to. People were fully in control of their care and support and staff prioritised supporting them to be as independent as they chose to be. There was a focus on treating people as individuals and focusing in on how best to support them with their own personal preferences, likes and dislikes. The positive outcomes people had been supported to achieve as a result of staff support were excellent.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

    Staff supported people in line with their likes, dislikes and preferences. People were supported to communicate in ways that made sense to them. People were supported to follow their interests and be an active part of the local community. Care plans were person centred and detailed, giving clear guidance about how best to support people. People were being supported to have positive experiences and outcomes.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    Governance measures and audits were effective in monitoring the quality of the service and implementing and making improvements in other areas where necessary. There was a positive culture at the service. People were happy with their support and enjoyed living at the service and following their past times. Staff enjoyed working at the service and felt well supported. There had been a lot of improvements at the service since our last inspection.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kathleen Houseago
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 8 October 2021. Latest assessment published 11 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Accomplish Group Support LimitedBrand: Accomplish Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02187883 (opens Companies House)

Accomplish Group Support Limited runs 11 services in England, 9 of them in the East of England. 10 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Accomplish Group Support Limited

  1. G
    Cranwell Court Good. Care home, Bedford
  2. G
    Elm House Good. Care home, Cambridgeshire
  3. G
    Eynesbury House Good. Care home, Cambridgeshire
  4. G
    Fairford Court Good. Care home, Barnet, London

See all 11 services run by Accomplish Group Support Limited

Getting help from Bedford Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Pathway House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Pathway House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Pathway House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 12 beds at Pathway House.
When was Pathway House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pathway House was published on 11 July 2025.
Who runs Pathway House?
Pathway House is run by Accomplish Group Support Limited. It runs 11 services in England, 9 of them in the East of England.
What is Pathway House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 11 July 2025.

Contact

Phone
01480 478099
Address
The Lane, Wyboston, Bedford, MK44 3AS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cranwell Court Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wyboston Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    The Marbrook Centre Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Nelson Lodge Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Hillings Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Bedford