Rated Care Homes

Langwith Lodge Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in September 2026.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 186 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Langwith Lodge Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 54 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in September 2026.

Langwith Lodge Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Malborn Teroan House Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Oaklands Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Richmond Residential Care Home Good, 2 miles away
  4. –
    Rockley Core Unit Not yet rated, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    23 Church Street Good, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Market Warsop

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 September 2026 (assessment visit 17 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Langwith Lodge Care home is a residential care home that provides personal care and accommodation. There were 45 people using the service at the time of assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This service provides support to older people including people living with dementia.

Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 10 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice. There were 45 people using this service at the time of the assessment.

People told us they were happy living at the service and felt safe. They consistently spoke positively about the care they received and said staff were well trained, knew what they were doing and treated them with kindness and respect. We observed many positive interactions between staff and people. Staff knew people well, supported people to make choices and promoted their independence. People had access to healthcare professionals when needed and were supported to maintain their wellbeing.
Staff understood how to recognise and report safeguarding concerns and knew how to raise concerns through whistleblowing procedures. The home was clean, odour free and people received support from staff who understood their needs. We observed a relaxed and unhurried mealtime experience, with people offered choice and supported in a respectful way.
However, governance systems had not always been effective in identifying and addressing environmental and health and safety risks. We found window restrictors had not been fitted with tamper-proof screws and health and safety audits had not identified this. We also identified water deadlegs that had not been addressed despite actions having been recommended within a previous legionella risk assessment. In addition, provider oversight had failed to identify risks associated with the external fire assembly point, fire escape routes, signage and lighting. We found further environmental issues including unlocked clinical waste bins and areas of the home that were worn or damaged, which could affect effective cleaning. Although immediate action was taken by the registered manager to address a number of concerns, these findings demonstrated that oversight and audit systems had not always been effective.
We also found examples where care records and risk assessments were not always accurate or sufficiently detailed. For example, one person’s care plan did not contain a specific risk assessment regarding their emotional wellbeing and another contained inconsistencies. These issues were addressed promptly during the assessment.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.
At our previous inspection, the service was rated as good overall. We found the service continued to demonstrate many positive aspects of care, including caring staff, positive outcomes for people and a culture that promoted choice and independence. However, improvements were needed to strengthen governance arrangements and ensure environmental risks were consistently identified and acted upon.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Zoe Searston
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 22 January 2021. Latest assessment published 17 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Your Health LimitedBrand: Your Health Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03087838 (opens Companies House)

Your Health Limited runs 8 services in England, 4 of them in the East Midlands. 8 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Your Health Limited

  1. G
    Abbey Court Nursing and Residential Home Good. Care home with nursing, Derby
  2. G
    Cedar Court Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Derbyshire
  3. G
    Cedar Court Nursing Home (Dementia Unit) Good. Care home with nursing, Derbyshire
  4. G
    Redmount Residential Care Home Good. Care home, Devon, South West

See all 8 services run by Your Health Limited

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Langwith Lodge Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Langwith Lodge Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Langwith Lodge Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 54 beds at Langwith Lodge Care Home.
When was Langwith Lodge Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Langwith Lodge Care Home was published on 17 September 2026.
Who runs Langwith Lodge Care Home?
Langwith Lodge Care Home is run by Your Health Limited. It runs 8 services in England, 4 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Langwith Lodge Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01623 742204
Address
The Park, Nether Langwith, Mansfield, NG20 9ES Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Malborn Teroan House Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Oaklands Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Richmond Residential Care Home Good, 2 miles away
  4. –
    Rockley Core Unit Not yet rated, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    23 Church Street Good, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Market Warsop