Salisbury House Residential Home
- Care home
- 37 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Prenton, Wirral, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
72 of 101
rated care homes in Wirral are rated Good, like this one.
Salisbury House Residential Home: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Lezayre Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Daleside Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Grovewood Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Summer Fields Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Woodland Grove Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 September 2026 (assessment visit 5 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Salisbury House Residential home is a care home providing personal care for older adults, including those living with dementia. There were 36 people using the service at the time of the inspection. We carried out a site visit on 13 August 2026 with the remainder of the inspection being completed off site.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People were protected from the risk of abuse and harm. Risks to people were identified and measures were in place to help ensure people received safe care.
Staff were recruited safely and people were supported by a team of trained and experienced staff. Many of the staff had worked at the home for a long time and so knew people well.
People received medicines in a safe way, from staff who were trained and had their competency assessed.
Systems were in place for reporting any accidents and incidents and learning from them. Incidents were analysed for any trends and patterns to help reduce the risk of recurrence.
People’s support needs were assessed prior to their admission to help ensure their choices were fully understood and respected, and their needs could be met in full.
People’s care plans contained guidance for staff on how to provide personalised care and support to people. Care plans were reviewed regularly to ensure care and support were both relevant and effective.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People and family members were involved in decisions about care and support at every opportunity.
People were treated with kindness and compassion, and their privacy, dignity and independence were promoted and respected. Staff had developed strong relationships with both people and their families. People’s relatives were made to feel welcome by staff when they visited.
Processes were in place to ensure people and their significant others were able to express their views and opinions, in a variety of ways. People and their relatives were able to provide their feedback at any time.
The leadership of the service was underpinned by a culture which was committed to delivering high quality, safe and person-centred care in a family like environment. Governance processes were used to help identify any shortfalls in practice and monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.
Both leaders and staff worked in conjunction with other external professionals, to help deliver the best possible care for people.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Russell Canner
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 8 January 2021. Latest assessment published 29 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03553977 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Wirral Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Wirral Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0151 606 2006, Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0151 677 6557
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Salisbury House Residential Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Salisbury House Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Salisbury House Residential Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 37 beds at Salisbury House Residential Home.
- When was Salisbury House Residential Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Salisbury House Residential Home was published on 29 September 2026.
- Who runs Salisbury House Residential Home?
- Salisbury House Residential Home is run by Salisbury Management Services Limited.
- What is Salisbury House Residential Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0151 645 6815
- Address
- 83-85 Egerton Park, Rock Ferry, Birkenhead, CH42 4RD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Lezayre Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Daleside Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Grovewood Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Summer Fields Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Woodland Grove Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away