Rated Care Homes

Westdene House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Westdene House: inspection record

Care home, 14 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in November 2022, up from Requires improvement.

Westdene House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Victoria Royal Beach Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Michaels Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Care for Veterans Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Lavender Lodge Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Pentlands Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Worthing

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 9 November 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Westdene House is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 14 people. The service provides support to people living with dementia and age-related frailties. At the time of our inspection there were 12 people using the service.

What inspectors found

Quality assurance processes were in place; however, audits of care records had not always identified some inaccuracies in some people's care records. The inaccuracies had no negative impact to people and were rectified during the inspection. The registered manager told us of their plans to increase further monitoring of records. Other quality assurance processes were effective in identifying areas for improvement, such as, environmental checks and audits.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People told us they felt safe at the service. People appeared relaxed and spoke freely with staff and the registered manager. Staff understood their responsibilities to safeguard people from the risk of potential abuse and knew how to report concerns internally and to external professional bodies. One staff member told us, "If I saw something, I would tell the manager. If nothing changed, I would contact social care."

People's needs were assessed, and risks associated to people's health were mitigated. Where people had healthcare equipment, such as, catheters in situ, staff followed care plans to ensure they were supported safely and kept well hydrated. Staff received training relevant to their roles and demonstrated knowledge on how they provided safe care to people.

People received their medicines by staff who were trained and assessed as competent to administer them. Medicines were administered safely, staff carried out checks to ensure storage, documentation and administration was completed correctly. Relatives told us they were kept informed of their loved one's changes to health and medicines. One relative said, "Staff keep me informed of any changes in [person's] care or medication, or if they are unwell, communication is good usually by phone."

People were supported by enough staff who knew them well. Staff told us there was enough time to spend with people, our observations confirmed this. A visiting social care professional told us, "The residents tend to be out in the social areas which is a positive. Interactions I've seen are positive, they (staff) have a good rapport with them (people), calling them by their first names. No concerns at all, the home is clean, it's a small home so staff can be very individualised with the care they give."

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were enabled to go out for walks, the local café and seafront. The registered manager had risk assessed trips out to ensure people were safe.

People were empowered to make and maintain relationships with friends and family. This was achieved by visits inside the service or people going out with their loved ones, where needed, people could contact relatives using video technology. People and their relatives told us staff and management listened to them and their opinions mattered. The registered manager held meetings and gathered views from feedback surveys. One person told us, "It's all pretty much nice. I am happy and if there were any queries, I would raise them."

People had access to health care professional advice, staff sought advice in a timely way and followed professional's directions. One healthcare professional told us, "They know the residents very well and they are very involved in their care. They are appropriate and reasonable with their requests. There doesn't seem to be a huge staff turnover which is a positive sign. They are very welcoming; they follow appropriate processes."

People were supported by a consistent staff team, led by a committed registered manager and management team. The registered manager told us they were proud of the commitment and resilience of the staffing team throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Nayanapriya Kuruppuarachchi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 9 November 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08754029 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westdene House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Westdene House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Westdene House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 14 beds at Westdene House.
When was Westdene House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westdene House was published on 9 November 2022.
Who runs Westdene House?
Westdene House is run by Aspire Life Care Limited.
What is Westdene House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 November 2022.

Contact

Phone
01903 247808
Address
1 Rye Close, Worthing, BN11 5EG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Victoria Royal Beach Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Michaels Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Care for Veterans Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Lavender Lodge Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Pentlands Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Worthing