Bishops Corner
- Care home
- 9 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Hastings, East Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in April 2026.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
214 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
Bishops Corner: inspection record
Rated Good in April 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Bethune Court Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI The Moreton Centre Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Bannow Retirement Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G The Whitebeach Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI The Park Beck Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 April 2026 (assessment visit 9 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment, 11 of March to the 23 March 2026.
Bishops Corner is a care home providing residential care for up to nine adults with learning disabilities. They provide residential care for people with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS). There were 9 people currently living in the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This service was last inspected in 2017 and rated Good. This inspection was planned and undertaken due to the age of the rating. At this inspection, whilst we found improvements were needed, the rating of the service has remained Good, as outcomes for people were positive.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Although staff knew people living at the service well, care plans and risk assessments were generic and not specific to each person. Some health conditions were not identified in the persons care plan, though staff were able to tell us about them. The service had recently moved to a computerised care plan system, and some information had been lost during the transition. We shared these findings with the registered manager who took immediate action to ensure that care plans were reviewed. There were systems and processes in place to record accidents and incidents, however the records did not look at themes, trends and lessons learnt to mitigate future risks. The registered manager was in the process of making improvements to the management of medicines in line with current best practice guidance.
Audits were in place and were being used by the management team to drive improvement. However they had not identified some of the shortfalls found. The registered manager took immediate action to make improvements where issues had the potential to impact on safe outcomes for people. For example, specific care documentation and risk assessments and medicine management. Despite the shortfalls found and discussed, due to staff knowledge, staff at this time provided care to meet people’s needs that was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things that mattered to them.
During the assessment there was a positive culture of safety, based on openness and transparency. People received safe care and staff managed risks safely. There were a sufficient number of suitably trained staff. Staff were recruited safely. People and staff told us they would feel confident to raise any concerns and that these would be responded to by the management team. There was an openness from staff that things had been a challenge with management changes but with the new manager, they felt they could speak up and be listened to. The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. This had promoted safe transitions for people moving between different services. The premises were well maintained. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was used appropriately. People enjoyed their meals and were supported by staff to follow a healthy lifestyle within a risk assessment framework.
Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and open culture in the service. With no exception the staff demonstrated a good understanding of the people they supported and ensured that people were happy and fulfilled.
Systems were in place that allowed people, relatives and staff to speak up and have their voices heard.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good.This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Stuart Funnell
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, People with an eating disorder, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 13 October 2017. Latest assessment published 21 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- New Directions (Bexhill) LimitedBrand: Priory Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03884127 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Bishops Corner provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bishops Corner as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Bishops Corner have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Bishops Corner.
- When was Bishops Corner last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bishops Corner was published on 21 April 2026.
- Who runs Bishops Corner?
- Bishops Corner is run by New Directions (Bexhill) Limited.
- What is Bishops Corner's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01424 201643
- Address
- 23 Boscobel Road, St Leonards On Sea, TN38 0LX Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Bethune Court Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI The Moreton Centre Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Bannow Retirement Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G The Whitebeach Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI The Park Beck Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away