Rated Care Homes

Westcott House Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Westcott House Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 60 beds, Surrey

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026, down from Good.

Westcott House Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bramley House Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Nower House (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bramley House Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Nower House Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Dorking Manor Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Tuscany House Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Rose Hill Nursing Home Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Dorking

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 August 2026 (assessment visit 27 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 2 June to 12 June 2026

Westcott House Nursing Home is a nursing home registered to provide care and support for up to 60 people, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of the assessment, there were 51 people living in the service.

We found the provider’s governance processes needed to improve in order to consistently identify areas of improvement and address these. Whilst there had been significant improvement in environmental aspects of the service, areas such as care records were not always person-centred and incidents were not always shared with all appropriate agencies consistently.

Staff had received an induction, training and regular supervisions, but they did not always understand safeguarding or the risk of isolation, and some staff told us they did not always feel able to speak up.

Equipment was not always set according to people’s weight, such as air-flow mattresses to reduce the risk of developing pressure areas and staff did not always reposition people in line with their risk assessments. Whilst people had not been directly impacted, the provider’s systems did not always identify these.

There were generally sufficient staff to meet people’s needs and staff were recruited safely but we found that mealtimes were unorganised due to ineffective staff deployment at specific times when people required extra support. People had to wait for their meals or to be assisted out of their rooms. People were rushed to eat where they needed assistance to do so, and some people received cold meals due to a long wait. Activities were not always tailored to people’s needs and we received mixed feedback from people and their relatives in relation to the provision of activities.

We have found breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and the governance of the service.

The registered manager and provider were responsive when we made them aware of these shortfalls, and they provided us with assurances that the areas had been addressed. However, the systems needed to become embedded in the service. Before the completion of this assessment, the provider recruited a quality assurance manager and involved an external consultant to address all areas in a coherent way.

People’s needs were assessed before they moved into the service and staff understood their responsibilities in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Health and safety checks of the premises were undertaken regularly. Healthcare professionals and partners told us the service was responsive to people’s needs.

Information was available in a format that suited people. The registered manager understood how barriers to people’s care affected them and were aware of the challenges. They told us they tried to foster an open culture, and the majority of feedback from staff and external partners reflected this.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lakshmi Radhamaniamma Chandrabhanu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14850321 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westcott House Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Westcott House Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Westcott House Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Westcott House Nursing Home.
When was Westcott House Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westcott House Nursing Home was published on 18 August 2026.
Who runs Westcott House Nursing Home?
Westcott House Nursing Home is run by Y & M Care Westcott Ltd.
What is Westcott House Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01306 881421
Address
Guildford Road, Westcott, Dorking, RH4 3QD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bramley House Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Nower House (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bramley House Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Nower House Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Dorking Manor Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Tuscany House Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Rose Hill Nursing Home Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Dorking