Rated Care Homes

Sahara Parkside

Care home, Barking and Dagenham, 30 beds

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Sahara Parkside: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Barking and Dagenham

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025, down from Good.

Sahara Parkside: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 7 times since 2016. First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in June 2025.

Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 17 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • The only Requires improvement care home in Barking and Dagenham, out of 20 with a rating.
  • About the middle for size in Barking and Dagenham.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 June 2025 (assessment visit 25 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment was carried out with two visits to the service on 19 and 28 March 2025. Sahara Parkside is a service providing accommodation and personal care to people with a range of needs including people with learning disabilities, autistic people and people with physical disabilities. The service has 10 flats and at the time of our visits 17 people were being supported.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and access to communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is a guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people which providers must adhere to. The last rating in December 2021 for this service was good.

Read the full summary

We had previously inspected the service in October 2021, when we rated the safe, effective, caring and responsive domains as good. We had rated well led as requires improvement. Overall, we had rated the service good. During this assessment we reviewed all domains and our ratings for the service changed. We rated safe and well as requires improvement. We rated effective, caring and responsive as good. Overall, we rated the service as requires improvement. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

We found breaches of Regulation 17, Good governance and Regulation 12 Safe care and treatment. There was no registered manager in post at the time of our assessment which meant there was lack of leadership. The provider’s systems and processes were not always effective in assessing, monitoring and improving the quality of the service. There was also a lack of training in managing violence and aggression and records about how to manage individual’s risk were not up to date.

We also found the provider had enough staff working flexibly across flats within the building to deliver support to people that met their care needs. Each flat was for 3 people and all were modernised, fully accessible with each bedroom having an en-suite wet room. People were supported to have choice and control and were protected from harm and abuse. Processes to record incidents and accidents were in place and lessons learnt each time drove future learning.

People were treated with kindness and compassion and interactions indicated relationships between people supported and staff were genuine and positive

The staff and management were able to describe the values, ethos and attitudes that created the right culture within the service. There was a willingness to learn when things went wrong and an acknowledgement that the service may not suit everyone and where applicable the provider worked in partnership with others to find a suitable alternative accommodation.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment we rated this as requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there were limited assurances about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    There was a lack of training for staff in supporting people to manage their aggression. Some peoples risk assessment and management plans had not been regularly updated. This was a breach of Regulation 12, Safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this. However, improvements were needed to ensure that people’s family and carers were always appropriately consulted when best interests decisions were being made.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question was good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question was good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent.

    There was no registered manager in post at the time of our assessment which meant there was lack of leadership. The provider’s systems and processes were not always effective in assessing, monitoring and improving the quality of the service. This was a breach of Regulation 17, good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 2 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Contact and registration details

Details for Sahara Parkside
Address101-113 Longbridge Road, Barking, IG11 8TA
NeighbourhoodBarking, Barking and Dagenham
Phone020 8507 5802
Websitewww.saharahomes.co.uk
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • People with an eating disorder
  • Physical Disability
  • Sensory Impairment
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 11 inspection reports, latest 4 December 2021 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 2 June 2025; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Sahara Parkside
ProviderSahara Parkside Limited
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number06000883 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Strathfield Gardens Care home, 0.1 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    102 Faircross Avenue Care home, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Faircross Care Home London Limited Care home, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    St Lukes Care Home Care home, 0.7 miles away
    Good
  5. RI
    Seabrooke Manor Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles away
    Requires improvement

See all care homes in Barking and Dagenham

Getting help from London Borough of Barking and Dagenham

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sahara Parkside provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sahara Parkside as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Sahara Parkside have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Sahara Parkside.
When was Sahara Parkside last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sahara Parkside was published on 2 June 2025.
Who runs Sahara Parkside?
Sahara Parkside is run by Sahara Parkside Limited.
What is Sahara Parkside's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 2 June 2025.