1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2023
- Prenton, Wirral, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
72 of 101
rated care homes in Wirral are rated Good, like this one.
1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Daleside Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Salisbury House Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Lezayre Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- – North Road Residential Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- RI Sylvan House Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 May 2026 (assessment visit 13 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The service is a care home that can provide personal care for up to 3 people. At the time of our assessment, 3 people were living in the care home. The home comprises three separate properties, each with its own outdoor garden area. The service is registered for people with learning disabilities and/or autistic disorder, younger adults, mental health, sensory impairment, and physical disability.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against the Right support, right care, right culture guidance to determine whether people with a learning disability and autistic people were supported with dignity, equality, choice, independence and access to everyday community life. We found the provider was meeting these principles. People were supported to express their views in ways that suited them, their choices were respected, and staff encouraged and enabled them to lead as fulfilling and independent a life as possible.
The service promoted a strong learning culture where people, relatives and staff felt comfortable raising concerns. People were kept safe, and both the registered manager and staff understood and managed risks effectively. All facilities and equipment were clean, well-maintained, and met people’s needs. There were enough experienced staff who understood their roles and responsibilities, and the service supported staff wellbeing. Medicines were managed safely and appropriately.
Care was person‑centred, supported by detailed and informative care plans that were regularly updated to reflect each person’s current needs. Robust processes were in place to ensure good quality care and support. There were effective systems for recording and monitoring information. The management team maintained strong oversight by being visible and accessible to staff, and by routinely auditing care plans and other key documents.
People were treated with kindness and compassion, and staff protected their privacy and dignity. Staff recognised people as individuals, respected their preferences, and supported them to make choices about their care. People were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends, and staff responded promptly to their needs. Information was provided in formats people could easily understand and access.
People took part in activities of their choice within the home and were supported and encouraged to go out into the community. The provider worked closely with other health and social care services, maintaining clear and effective communication to ensure each person received personalised care that met their individual needs.
The registered manager and provider promoted a clear, shared vision rooted in listening, learning, and trust. They worked closely with the local community to help deliver high‑quality care. A strong culture of continuous improvement was evident throughout the service.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- David Lewis
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- AP Birkenhead Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13023861 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Wirral Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Wirral Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0151 606 2006, Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0151 677 6557
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens.
- When was 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens was published on 6 May 2026.
- Who runs 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens?
- 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens is run by AP Birkenhead Limited.
- What is 1, 2 and 3 St Georges Gardens's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 May 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0330 401 1229
- Address
- St. Georges Gardens, St. Georges Avenue, Birkenhead, CH42 6SJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Daleside Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Salisbury House Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Lezayre Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- – North Road Residential Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- RI Sylvan House Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away