Rated Care Homes

Seventrees Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Seventrees Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.

Seventrees Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Dryad Spinney (Good, 1 mile away) and Badgers Holt Residential Care Home (Good, 2.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashlett Dale Rest Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Dryad Spinney Good, 1 mile away
  3. RI
    Sundial Cottage Rest Home Ltd Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  4. –
    Lime Kiln House Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Badgers Holt Residential Care Home Good, 2.6 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Fawley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2026 (assessment visit 18 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 January to 10 February 2026. The reason for this assessment was because there was a new provider for this service who had not yet been assessed.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

We found improvements were needed in some aspects of the service for people’s safety. These included, managing risks with the environment, providing people with meaningful and stimulating activities, and governance.

Risks to the environment had not always been identified and assessed. Where risks had been identified, action had not always been taken to taken to reduce the risk to people. These included fire, legionella and other environmental risks associated with the service.

Following a provider led organisational restructure, there was no registered manager at the service. Management oversight systems had not been used effectively to assess, monitor and improve the safety of the service, and had not identified the shortfalls we found during the inspection.

However, the provider was open and responsive to concerns and took some action to reduce risks.

There was a consistent staff team who knew people well, treated them with dignity and respect, and worked effectively with other services so people had the healthcare and support they needed.

During our assessment, we found 3 breaches of regulations in relation to person centred care, safe care and treatment, and governance.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to 3 of the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care at the service.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 1 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 1 July 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 1 July 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 1 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joanna Arbuckle
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04071822 (opens Companies House)

Sandbourne House Ltd runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Sandbourne House Ltd

  1. –
    The Pines Residential Care Home No overall rating. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, South West

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Seventrees Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Seventrees Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Seventrees Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Seventrees Care Home.
When was Seventrees Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Seventrees Care Home was published on 1 July 2026.
Who runs Seventrees Care Home?
Seventrees Care Home is run by Sandbourne House Ltd. It runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South East.
What is Seventrees Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 1 July 2026.

Contact

Address
Seven Trees, Blackfield Road, Fawley, Southampton, SO45 1EH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Dryad Spinney (Good, 1 mile away) and Badgers Holt Residential Care Home (Good, 2.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashlett Dale Rest Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Dryad Spinney Good, 1 mile away
  3. RI
    Sundial Cottage Rest Home Ltd Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  4. –
    Lime Kiln House Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Badgers Holt Residential Care Home Good, 2.6 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Fawley