Rated Care Homes

New Bradley Hall

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in August 2026.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 82

    rated care homes in Dudley are rated Good, like this one.

New Bradley Hall: inspection record

Care home, 66 beds, Dudley

Rated Good in August 2026.

New Bradley Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Highfield Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Wyncroft House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Castlewellan House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Oaklands Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Redbrick Court Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Dudley

See all care homes in Kingswinford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 August 2026 (assessment visit 30 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 13 – 27 July 2026.

New Bradley Hall is registered to provide accommodation, care and support for people who require nursing or personal care, including people living with dementia. The service can accommodate up to 66 people. At the time of our visit, there were 63 people living at the home.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

There was a culture of continuous improvement and learning which was shared with staff to drive improvements in the home. People were involved in assessments of their needs which considered people’s communication, personal and health needs. People were supported to have enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked well with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff sought peoples consent before providing support.

People were treated with kindness and compassion and involved as partners in their care. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People were supported to make daily choices about their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely and caring way.

Staff provided information people could understand. Systems were in place to enable people, those important to them, and partner agencies to give feedback which the provider took account of and where needed acted upon.

Staff were recruited safely and received the training they needed for their role. The provider supported staff development and wellbeing.

The home was managed by a supportive and effective management team with a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff were passionate about their role, felt supported, valued and were treated equally.

Governance systems were in place to enable the management team to maintain oversight and ensure people received safe and good quality care. However, we found some improvements were required with records which had not always been updated following changes in some people’s needs. We also found some improvements were needed with the management of some peoples ‘as required’ (PRN) medicines. The management team and provider were receptive to our feedback and immediate actions were taken to address the issues we raised.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Carole Campini
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 24 October 2019. Latest assessment published 7 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP21157R (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does New Bradley Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists New Bradley Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does New Bradley Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 66 beds at New Bradley Hall.
When was New Bradley Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for New Bradley Hall was published on 7 August 2026.
Who runs New Bradley Hall?
New Bradley Hall is run by Black Country Housing Group Limited.
What is New Bradley Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01384 278689
Address
Compton Drive, Stream Road, Kingswinford, DY6 9NS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Highfield Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Wyncroft House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Castlewellan House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Oaklands Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Redbrick Court Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Dudley

See all care homes in Kingswinford