Rated Care Homes

Chasewater Mews

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 174 of 231

    rated care homes in Staffordshire are rated Good, like this one.

Chasewater Mews: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 68 beds, Staffordshire

Rated Good in August 2025.

Chasewater Mews: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Priory Highfields Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Chaseview Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Grangemoor House Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    The Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    WhiteHorse Care - Brownhills Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 August 2025 (assessment visit 30 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 10 July to 28 July 2025. The service is a residential care home service providing support to older people including people living with dementia and physical disabilities. This inspection was triggered by concerns raised about the care and treatment provided to people. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider fostered a strong learning culture where concerns could be raised, and incidents were thoroughly investigated. People were kept safe through effective risk management and well-maintained, clean facilities that met their needs. However, we observed exposed pipes in 1 bathroom which placed people at risk of potential scalds, the provider promptly addressed this following our feedback. Staffing levels were sufficient, recruitment was safe, and staff received appropriate training and regular supervision. Medicines were well managed and routinely reviewed.

People and their relatives were involved in regular assessments of care needs. Staff supported healthy living by monitoring people’s health and making appropriate referrals to health professionals when required. However, people’s fluid intake targets had not been set, making it unclear how people’s hydration needs were being monitored. The provider addressed this by consulting a health professional to establish appropriate targets. Where people lacked capacity, decisions were made in their best interests with input from those close to them.

People were treated with kindness, compassion, and respect. Staff supported individual preferences, offered choice, and encouraged relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people's care needs in a timely manner, and staff wellbeing was actively supported by the provider.

People were actively involved in planning their care, with clear, accessible information provided by staff. People and relatives knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took their concerns seriously. The home was adapted to meet individual needs, ensuring fair, inclusive care. End-of-life wishes were respectfully documented.

Leaders and staff shared a culture of trust, learning, and open communication. Leadership was visible and supportive, promoting staff development and continuous improvement. While governance systems were in place, some checks, such as environmental and fluid monitoring, needed improvement, which the provider addressed. Staff felt valued, understood their roles, and worked in an inclusive, respectful environment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first inspection for this service under a new provider. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first inspection for this service under a new provider. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first inspection for this service under a new provider. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first inspection for this service under a new provider. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first inspection for this service under a new provider. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sarah Edwards
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15209460 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Staffordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Chasewater Mews provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Chasewater Mews as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Chasewater Mews have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 68 beds at Chasewater Mews.
When was Chasewater Mews last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Chasewater Mews was published on 26 August 2025.
Who runs Chasewater Mews?
Chasewater Mews is run by Stafford Invest Ltd.
What is Chasewater Mews's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 August 2025.

Contact

Phone
01543 624809
Address
160 High Street, Chasetown, Burntwood, WS7 3XG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Priory Highfields Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Chaseview Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Grangemoor House Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    The Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    WhiteHorse Care - Brownhills Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire