Stone Barton Short Break
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2025
- Plympton, Plymouth, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2021, most recently Good in August 2026.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
58 of 83
rated care homes in Plymouth are rated Good, like this one.
Stone Barton Short Break: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Meadowside and St. Francis Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Plymbridge House Good, 0.2 miles away
- – Ashleigh Manor Residential Care Home No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
- G Merafield View Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- RI The Old School House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 August 2026 (assessment visit 6 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Dates of assessment: Between 30 June and 15 July 2026.
Stone Barton Short Breaks is a residential respite service providing accommodation and personal care for up to 3 adults, they support autistic people and people with learning disabilities, physical disabilities and sensory impairments.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
An assessment has been undertaken of a service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Right support -
People were supported to live as independently as possible and to maintain meaningful routines during their stay. Staff understood people’s individual needs and preferences and used personalised approaches to support them. We saw and heard examples of people being supported to make choices about their daily lives, including activities, meals and routines. Staff adapted their communication to meet individual needs, for example through the use of visual aids, gestures and simplified language. This helped people to express their preferences and remain actively involved in their care.
Relatives told us people were encouraged to take part in activities and maintain skills, and staff described promoting independence through an active support approach. This demonstrates the service was supporting people to have control over their lives and access opportunities that matter to them.
Right care -
People were supported by staff who were described as kind, respectful and compassionate. Observations and feedback consistently showed staff understood people well and treated them with dignity. Privacy was respected, and staff promoted consent and choice in day-to-day care delivery.
Relatives told us they felt confident in the care provided and described staff as attentive and responsive. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding processes and people were protected from avoidable harm through established systems and safe practices. Medicines were managed safely and care plans generally provided guidance to support safe and effective care.
These findings demonstrate people were supported in a way which upheld their human rights, dignity and individual preferences.
Right culture -
There was a positive and inclusive culture within the service, where staff worked well together and felt supported by management. Staff consistently described leaders as approachable, supportive and available, and spoke positively about teamwork and shared values.
Leaders promoted a culture of openness and learning, with governance systems to monitor quality and share learning from incidents. There was evidence of staff development through training, supervision and regular meetings, and staff were encouraged to raise concerns and contribute to improvements.
Relatives also provided largely positive feedback about the leadership and communication within the service, describing managers as responsive and accessible. This indicates the service is working towards a culture of open, person-centred and focused on continuous improvement.
The service demonstrated a positive culture with many aspects of care being delivered well, supported by committed staff and effective day-to-day care practices. Evidence gathered from people, relatives and staff showed people were supported by kind, caring and knowledgeable staff, with care personalised to individual needs and preferences. Relatives consistently told us people were safe, well supported and had developed trusting relationships with staff, and staff described strong teamwork and a supportive working environment.
Care plans and risk assessments reflected people’s needs. Staff told us they were easy to access and understand, and they were updated regularly.
The service worked with healthcare professionals and supported people with complex health needs, including PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube) feeding and specialist diets. Staff received relevant training and felt confident in their roles.
Overall, the service demonstrated strong person-centred practice, a caring staff team and a positive culture, and people had good experiences of care. The service was working in line with the principles of right support, right care, right culture, particularly in the way staff promoted choice, independence and dignity in everyday care.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Faye Slyde
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Selborne Care LimitedBrand: CareTech Community Services
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05513162 (opens Companies House)
Selborne Care Limited runs 9 services in England, 4 of them in the South West. 8 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Selborne Care Limited
- G Eros Crescent Good. Care home, Stoke-on-Trent, West Midlands
- G Holendene Way Good. Care home, Staffordshire, West Midlands
- G Kinsey Road Good. Care home, Sandwell, West Midlands
- G Selborne Care DCA Good. Home care, Gloucestershire
Getting help from Plymouth City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Plymouth City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01752 668000, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Plymouth City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Stone Barton Short Break provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Stone Barton Short Break as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Stone Barton Short Break have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at Stone Barton Short Break.
- When was Stone Barton Short Break last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Stone Barton Short Break was published on 20 August 2026.
- Who runs Stone Barton Short Break?
- Stone Barton Short Break is run by Selborne Care Limited. It runs 9 services in England, 4 of them in the South West.
- What is Stone Barton Short Break's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07823 402285
- Address
- 37 Stone Barton Close, Plymouth, PL7 4LN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Meadowside and St. Francis Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Plymbridge House Good, 0.2 miles away
- – Ashleigh Manor Residential Care Home No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
- G Merafield View Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- RI The Old School House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away