Terry Yorath House
- Care home
- 12 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Roundhay, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
104 of 138
rated care homes in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.
Terry Yorath House: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Kingston Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- RI Alderbrook Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- – Alderbrook Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
- G Leeds Jewish Welfare Board - 248 Lidgett Lane Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Gledhow Good, 0.9 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 July 2026 (assessment visit 11 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 28 May to 4 June. We carried out this assessment because a significant period had passed since the service was last inspected.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Terry Yorath House is a residential care home providing support to older adults, younger adults, people with a physical disability, learning disability and autism. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. The Care Quality Commission regulates both the premises, and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. At the time of inspection there was 11 people living at the service.
At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a primary learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.
People’s needs were assessed using recognised tools across key areas, including nutrition, hydration, weight management, and skin integrity. Care and support plans were person-centred, reflecting individuals’ specific clinical needs, and people were actively involved in their development. The provider monitored outcomes effectively, ensuring timely referrals and input from external professionals such as GPs and district nursing teams.
The provider promoted a positive and transparent safety culture, where incidents were appropriately reported, reviewed and used as learning opportunities. Risk reduction measures, such as the use of sensor mats, were implemented to support people’s safety. Staff worked effectively with healthcare professionals to promote safe, coordinated care and ensure smooth transitions between services. Safeguarding procedures were understood, and staff demonstrated an ability to support people safely. However, some incidents had not been reported for management review by staff and therefore full oversight was not completed. No harm had been caused, and the provider took immediate action to improve reporting systems.
Staffing levels were appropriate to meet people’s needs, and people were supported to maintain their independence. Infection prevention and control measures were well managed, and the environment was clean. The service required some decoration and maintenance work both internally and externally, plans were in place for this.
We identified some recording issues with PRN (as and when required) medication and some medication stock. There had been no impact on people and issues were addressed promptly, by the registered manager.
The service used an electronic care system that contained key information about people’s care needs.
People were treated with kindness, empathy and respect. Staff were observed providing supportive care that maintained people’s dignity, including offering discreet personal care and ensuring people were clean and comfortable. Relatives were welcomed and supported during visits. People were encouraged to make choices and remain as independent as possible, moving freely around the home with support available when required.
Staff told us they felt confident to raise concerns, and the provider promoted an inclusive workforce that reflected a range of backgrounds and experiences. The management team were experienced, committed and focused on meeting people’s needs.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Anthony Beech
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 6 March 2021. Latest assessment published 23 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Saint John of God Hospitaller ServicesBrand: St John of God Hospitaller Services
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05324279 (opens Companies House)
- Charity number
- 1108428
Saint John of God Hospitaller Services runs 13 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 11 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Saint John of God Hospitaller Services
- G 21 North View Good. Care home, South Tyneside, North East
- G Balmaclellan Good. Care home, North Yorkshire
- G Elmthorpe Convent Domiciliary Care Good. Home care, Oxfordshire, South East
- G Saint John of God Hospitaller Services - 1 Bedes Close Good. Care home, Bradford
See all 13 services run by Saint John of God Hospitaller Services
Getting help from Leeds City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leeds City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0113 222 4401, weekdays 9am to 5pm (Wednesdays from 10am)
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leeds City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Terry Yorath House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Terry Yorath House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Terry Yorath House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 12 beds at Terry Yorath House.
- When was Terry Yorath House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Terry Yorath House was published on 23 July 2026.
- Who runs Terry Yorath House?
- Terry Yorath House is run by Saint John of God Hospitaller Services. It runs 13 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
- What is Terry Yorath House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0113 266 2445
- Address
- 18 Devonshire Close, Roundhay, Leeds, LS8 1BF Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Kingston Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- RI Alderbrook Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- – Alderbrook Nursing Home Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
- G Leeds Jewish Welfare Board - 248 Lidgett Lane Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Gledhow Good, 0.9 miles away