Rated Care Homes

Oak Trees (Respite)

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 18 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Oak Trees (Respite): inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Norfolk

Rated Outstanding in January 2020, up from Good.

Oak Trees (Respite): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brooklyn House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    St Edmunds Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    St Elmos Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Laurels Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Fairland House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Attleborough

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 10 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Oak Trees (Respite) is a residential care home which provides accommodation and personal care via a short break (respite) service to people with a learning disability. The service is registered to provide this regulated activity to up to four people at a time. At the time of the inspection three people were staying at the service and 33 people were using the service on a regular basis.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Oak Trees (Respite) is also registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection the service was providing support to 21 people with a learning disability across ten supported living locations. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

There were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom, cameras, or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

What inspectors found

Everyone we spoke with praised the high quality of the service provided. People, relatives, and professionals were keen to tell us about the support provided and the positive difference it made. There was a deeply embedded person centred, open, and inclusive ethos. People were fully consulted about their care arrangements and involved in the operation of the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People, relatives, and staff worked together to support and develop the service. There was a strong sense of ownership and investment amongst everyone involved with the service. There were strong links to the local community which were utilised to benefit people using the service and this enhanced their daily lives and provided them with equal opportunities. Everyone we spoke with praised the dynamic leadership in the service, notably the registered manager's passion and dedication. The provider was committed to developing and improving their service. They looked across the social care sector at best practice and considered how this could be implemented within their own service. Robust quality assurance systems underpinned the continual development and improvement in the service leading to positive outcomes for people. Throughout the service we found creative ideas and actions that had helped put people at the heart

of their care and decision making.

People were exceptionally safe using the service. There were established relationships of trust and support between staff which enabled people to stay safe. People were empowered to make decisions about their safety, which helped avoid unnecessary restrictions being placed on people and maximised their control over their lives. Staff were very sensitive to the vulnerabilities of people living in the community. They acted proactively when concerns were identified and supported people to protect themselves. A strong sense of security and safety had been created for people by the use of the respite service location as a flexible and accessible space. One relative likened the service location to 'a crisis centre' offering a safe space and support for people to stay safe whenever they needed it. People were supported by a creative and inclusive approach which helped them understand potential risks and make decisions in respect to this. Best practice guidance was utilised and adapted to support people's individual needs and circumstances.

People were supported by a stable and consistent staff team. People were allocated core groups of staff to aid continuity of care and ensure people felt comfortable and safe. If particular sensitive tasks or events took place, then people were supported to express which staff they might like to support them, which was accommodated. Each staff group's training and skills reviewed in relation to the people they supported. The service understood the importance of empowering people so that they could understood how to live safely. Safety training, such as first aid and infection control, was offered to people alongside staff. People were supported by staff who understood the importance of safe medicine administration. This included ensuring people had regular reviews of their medicines and staff supported people to reduce their use of medicines when appropriate.

People were supported by very compassionate and dedicated staff who genuinely cared for them. Staff took great care and effort to ensure people were supported and their needs met, particularly during distressing or difficult times. Understanding and respecting equality and diversity were at the heart of the service. People's rights were respected and encouraged. People were supported to lead fulfilling and rich lives by staff who had high expectations of their abilities and needs. This meant staff worked hard to support and increase people's independence. The service was very inclusive, everybody we spoke with told us that the service felt like a big extended family. The service understood the importance of advocacy and worked hard to ensure people were provided with independent advocacy where necessary. In addition, staff spoke up for people and advocated for them to ensure they had the support and services they needed.

Peoples needs were assessed holistically across a wide range of areas. This included needs in relation to people's protected characteristics such as gender and sexuality. People were supported by staff who had training and support to understand their needs. Staff were supported to professionally grow and develop, which included gaining nationally recognised qualifications.

People were supported to plan and cook their meals, information was given to people on healthy eating. The service took a proactive and creative approach to helping people understand their health care needs. People were supported to make decisions and feel in control of their own lives. Staff worked with specialist professionals to help support people's decision making. Where staff had identified concerns around people's ability to make particular more complex decisions they had requested specialist support, such as a psychologist, to support people's understanding and decision making. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were provided with flexible, responsive, person centred care. Staff knew people well. This helped them deliver care that met people's individual needs and preferences. People's needs, interests, and

backgrounds were taken in to account when supporting people to access the community and take part in social activities. The service thought creatively about how people could be supported to understand information. The service provided face to face information and training sessions to people using the service. A wide range of information, including the service's policies and procedures, were provided to people in an easy read format.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kerrie-Jane Good
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 10 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09959609 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Oak Trees (Respite) provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Oak Trees (Respite) as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Oak Trees (Respite) have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Oak Trees (Respite).
When was Oak Trees (Respite) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Oak Trees (Respite) was published on 10 January 2020.
Who runs Oak Trees (Respite)?
Oak Trees (Respite) is run by Empanda Care & Support Ltd CIC.
What is Oak Trees (Respite)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 10 January 2020.

Contact

Phone
01953 457774
Address
26 Norfolk Drive, Attleborough, NR17 1QW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brooklyn House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    St Edmunds Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    St Elmos Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Laurels Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Fairland House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Attleborough