Rated Care Homes

The Depperhaugh

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in June 2026.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 109 of 156

    rated care homes in Suffolk are rated Good, like this one.

The Depperhaugh: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 30 beds, Suffolk

Rated Good in June 2026.

The Depperhaugh: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Paddocks Good, 3.3 miles away
  2. G
    Oaklands Good, 4 miles away
  3. –
    Hartismere Place Not yet rated, 4.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Culrose Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.1 miles away
  5. G
    De Lucy House Good, 5.2 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 June 2026 (assessment visit 30 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Inspection: 13 May to 17 June 2026. The Depperhaugh is a residential care home with nursing for up to 30 older people including people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 26 people living there. This inspection was carried out due to the length of time since the last inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Depperhaugh was a safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led service. People’s experience of care and support was positive, and the service demonstrated a strong commitment to delivering person-centred care within a compassionate and inclusive culture.

Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. Relationships between people, staff and relatives were warm and meaningful. Feedback from relatives and professionals was positive, highlighting the significant impact the service had on people’s wellbeing and quality of life.

There was strong and visible leadership. The registered manager was highly regarded by staff, people and relatives and promoted a culture of openness, learning and continuous improvement. Staff felt supported and valued, which contributed to a positive working environment and effective team working.

People were supported to stay safe. There were clear systems in place to identify, report and learn from incidents, and staff understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding. Risks to people were identified and managed; however, some improvements were required to ensure care records and risk assessments were up to date and reflective of current needs. The registered manager took prompt action to address these issues.

Care and support was well coordinated and responsive to people’s needs, with good partnership working across healthcare services. People were supported to maintain their health and wellbeing and had access to healthcare professionals when required. A wide range of activities and opportunities were provided, ensuring people remained engaged and connected to their interests and the community.

Governance systems were in place and generally effective, although they had not identified the recording issues found during the inspection. Action was taken to strengthen oversight and improve documentation.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Debbie Reeve
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 12 December 2018. Latest assessment published 30 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Althea HealthCare LimitedBrand: Kingsley Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06321545 (opens Companies House)

Althea HealthCare Limited runs 3 services, all in the East of England. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Althea HealthCare Limited

  1. G
    Thorp House Good. Care home with nursing, Norfolk
  2. –
    Sycamore Heights Care Home Not yet rated. Care home with nursing, Bedford

Getting help from Suffolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Depperhaugh provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists The Depperhaugh as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does The Depperhaugh have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at The Depperhaugh.
When was The Depperhaugh last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Depperhaugh was published on 30 June 2026.
Who runs The Depperhaugh?
The Depperhaugh is run by Althea HealthCare Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the East of England.
What is The Depperhaugh's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01379 384236
Address
Chickering Road, Hoxne, IP21 5BX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Paddocks Good, 3.3 miles away
  2. G
    Oaklands Good, 4 miles away
  3. –
    Hartismere Place Not yet rated, 4.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Culrose Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.1 miles away
  5. G
    De Lucy House Good, 5.2 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk