Rated Care Homes

Yohden Hall Care Complex

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in June 2026.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 10 of 136

    rated care homes in County Durham are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Yohden Hall Care Complex: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 77 beds, County Durham

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026.

Yohden Hall Care Complex: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Field View (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Abbeyvale Care Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Field View Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Abbeyvale Care Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Belchford Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Jack Dormand Care Home Outstanding, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Bannatyne Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in County Durham

See all care homes in Peterlee

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 June 2026 (assessment visit 16 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 18 March to 28 April 2026. The service is a residential home providing support to older people, people with physical disabilities and people living with a dementia. This assessment was carried out because of the length of time since our last visit.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disabilityrespect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the providerhad regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

Since our last assessment improvements had been made in relation to infection prevention and control (IPC) practice and medicines management. However, governance processes were still not consistently identifying or addressing issues at the service. An issue with the safety and condition of the premises that had been first identified in 2022 had not been addressed by the time of this visit. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance processes.

People were safeguarded from abuse. Staff were supported with regular training, supervision and appraisal. Risks to people were assessed and addressed.

People’s needs and choices were monitored to ensure they received effective support. Care plans contained information on people's capacity and consent to their care which helped to ensure their rights were protected. Staff worked effectively with healthcare partners to ensure people received the support they wanted and needed.

People were treated with kindness by staff who knew them well. Care was provided in a way that protected people’s dignity and treated them with respect. Staff spoke positively about the support they received from managers and said they were happy working at the service.

People received personalised support based on their assessed needs and preferences. Information was made available to people in the most accessible formats possible. People were supported to maintain social links and access activates they enjoyed.

Staff felt able to speak up with any issues they had and felt supported in their roles. Feedback was sought and acted on. The service worked with the local community to deliver effective care.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 5 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Tanya Hardy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 2 September 2022. Latest assessment published 5 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
MMCG (CCH) (2) LimitedBrand: Maria Mallaband Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07714184 (opens Companies House)

MMCG (CCH) (2) Limited runs 13 services in England, 6 of them in the North East. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by MMCG (CCH) (2) Limited

  1. G
    Amber Court Good. Care home with nursing, Blackpool, North West
  2. G
    Astor Court Good. Care home with nursing, Northumberland
  3. G
    Astor Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Northumberland
  4. G
    Dussindale Park Good. Care home with nursing, Norfolk, East of England

See all 13 services run by MMCG (CCH) (2) Limited

Getting help from Durham County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Yohden Hall Care Complex provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Yohden Hall Care Complex as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Yohden Hall Care Complex have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 77 beds at Yohden Hall Care Complex.
When was Yohden Hall Care Complex last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Yohden Hall Care Complex was published on 5 June 2026.
Who runs Yohden Hall Care Complex?
Yohden Hall Care Complex is run by MMCG (CCH) (2) Limited. It runs 13 services in England, 6 of them in the North East.
What is Yohden Hall Care Complex's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 5 June 2026.

Contact

Address
Hesleden Road, Blackhall, Hartlepool, TS27 4LH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Field View (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Abbeyvale Care Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Field View Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Abbeyvale Care Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Belchford Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Jack Dormand Care Home Outstanding, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Bannatyne Lodge Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in County Durham

See all care homes in Peterlee