Rated Care Homes

The Orangery

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in December 2019.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 40 of 48

    rated care homes in Bath and North East Somerset are rated Good, like this one.

The Orangery: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 41 beds, Bath and North East Somerset

Rated Good in December 2019.

The Orangery: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rush Hill Mews Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Darcy Gardens Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Culverhayes Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Bath MIND - 82 Lower Oldfield Park Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Greystones Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Bath and North East Somerset

See all care homes in Englishcombe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 9 September 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The Orangery is a nursing home which can provide care to up to 40 people who are aged 65 and over. People who require general nursing care live on the ground floor, and those who are living with dementia on the first floor. At the time of our visit, 40 people were living at The Orangery.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found the following examples of good practice.

• Visits were well planned to reduce risk and avoid the potential spread of infection. Visitors received information before coming to the service so they know what to expect. This guidance was clear and personal protective equipment (PPE) was supplied. Visits usually took place in the garden area, but plans were in place to develop dedicated visitor areas as the weather becomes more inclement.

• When people were admitted to the service, current guidance requires that they must isolate themselves from other people who live there. These people were admitted to a room with ensuite facilities and direct access to garden areas to ensure they remained safe but had some freedom and independence.

• One person living at the service had been a musician. They asked if they could provide live musical entertainment when performers could not come into the service. This person performed a number of times during the period of lockdown, received positive feedback and enjoyed this role.

• Staff received additional training and completed competency assessments to show that they understood and followed guidance about infection control procedures such as hand washing and using PPE. The environment had been altered to ensure PPE was used and disposed of safely.

• Initially, staff lived in the service for two weeks then had two weeks off. This was to reduce risk and control the possible spread of infection. The provider considered staffs' wellbeing and needs during this time and on their return home. For example, the provider supplied a wide range of food, secured hotel accommodation when staff could not return home, and asked a local mental health team to support staff when this was required.

• A handbook which was available for staff about 'quarantining' in the service was informative and was translated into several languages. This ensured all staff had a good understanding about expectations.

• Audits were carried out daily and included general infection prevention and control checks, compliance with guidance and staff understanding of procedures and safe practice. Changes were made where needed and managers checked compliance regularly.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 5 December 2019. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 9 September 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03585946 (opens Companies House)

Cedar Care Homes Limited runs 12 services, all in the South West. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Cedar Care Homes Limited

  1. G
    Dearbourne Manor Good. Care home with nursing, Bristol
  2. G
    Gracefields Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, South Gloucestershire
  3. G
    Larkhall Springs Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Bath and North East Somerset
  4. G
    Oakhill Mansions Good. Care home with nursing, Bristol

See all 12 services run by Cedar Care Homes Limited

Getting help from Bath and North East Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Orangery provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists The Orangery as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does The Orangery have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 41 beds at The Orangery.
When was The Orangery last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Orangery was published on 5 December 2019.
Who runs The Orangery?
The Orangery is run by Cedar Care Homes Limited. It runs 12 services, all in the South West.
What is The Orangery's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 December 2019.